.


SPECIAL:

What Should Be The Beginning Of The End

For The AGW Scam

Regular readers shouldn't dismiss this special edition as just more of the same re: the Global Warming Canard. We've reached a critical point in this global attempt to use a false scientific premise as mechanism to seize governmental control of virtually all human activity and redistribute wealth on a global scale under the auspices of a de facto, unelected one world government.

The real story here isn't the exposure of the pervasive deception that has been perpetrated against humanity - that's been long known to anyone paying attention - but rather the race we find ourselves in to convince our so-called representatives that we're aware of their maleficence and will hold them accountable if they don't cease and desist in their machinations immediately.

Make no mistake; the power and money that will be won should they succeed in legislatively {in which I include international treaties} locking-in this lie are so vast as to warrant nearly any temporary embarrassment or condemnation - and so they {you know who they are} are intent on forcing this upon humanity safe in the knowledge that the power it garners them will make them all but immune to repercussions.

Like it or not YOU'RE in a fight for your children's future liberties - playing spectator won't suffice in this instance. As even a cursory review of the titles below proves, the only activity matching the scope of deception on this topic is its near black-out by major American media - and as multiple recent events have proven, the nearly-half of Americans that still get their 'news' from TV can be duped into believing anything {not the criticism it may sound when you consider they're only hearing one side's opinion on the issue} .

It therefore falls to those of us not so blinded to magnify our impact beyond our numbers by taking advantage of the power of the internet. PLEASE: Read, share with your friends, contact all your representatives and encourage them to do likewise. It will take government by the people to derail this monstrosity {in all its forms at all its levels} in its eleventh hour, and the enemies of liberty know the hour is late and are hurrying...

We need do likewise.

The former requires the latter.

..

Nets Ignore Climategate While FNC Reports

Subject: txt grn msm bias gdd -

[click to watch]

[The real news organization? You decide.]

READ MORE

Scientists Square Off In Heated ClimateGate Debate

Subject: txt grn msm -
Russia Today has been doing an outstanding job of reporting the growing ClimateGate scandal.

On Wednesday, RT featured an absolute must-see debate between Piers Corbyn, a British weather forecaster and consultant who believes anthropogenic global warming is a dangerous scam, and Aleksey Korkorin, a Russian climatologist and contributor to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

As you watch the following segment, try to imagine an American television news outlet besides Fox giving so much air time not only to a debate about this scandal, but also to a discussion about the very existence of global warming...

[Concise enlightenment {plain talk} and just plain entertaining -- HIGHLY RECOMMENDED > ]

Think you'll see that kind of debate on non-Fox television any time soon?

Yes, that was a rhetorical question.

[However on the internet, you can't miss it...

[link to article]

[Remember, we're talking hundreds of trillions of dollars and government control of virtually all activity - there's nothing funny about it and our 'representatives' will enact it if we don't demand an end to the nonsense.]

READ MORE

Down under, global warming is a free speech issue

[It's a free speech issue here too - we're just losing...]

In Australia, government-driven scientific censorship is causing a backlash

Australia's right-of-center opposition Liberal Party is fighting over carbon taxes. And, conservatives aren't shutting up, even challenging their leader, Malcolm Turnbull, a cap-and-tax fundamentalist.

But there's a more divisive national issue here: freedom of speech.

Here's Henry Ergas, from The Australian:

The hacked emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia show how far the rot has spread within the scientific community. I doubt the researchers involved view the issues in Hamilton's moralising terms. What is clear, however, is that these researchers regard scepticism as a dirty word.

Yet scepticism is the price knowledge pays for truth.We question our theories because that questioning is the means by which they will be displaced by better theories in future. The moment scepticism is abandoned for orthodoxy, scientific inquiry degenerates into pseudo-science, as with genetics in Trofim Lysenko's Soviet Union.

As a free-thinking individual, I reject all the-debate-is-over censors. So do many Australians.

This "unhealthy climate of political orthodoxy," notes Ergas is also being promoted by Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.

Over at the Telegraph (London), James Delingpole notes:

Australia is leading the revolt against Al Gore's great big AGW conspiracy - just as the Aussie geologist and AGW sceptic Professor Ian Plimer predicted it would.

ABC [Australia's] news reports that five frontbenchers from Australia's opposition Liberal party have resigned their portfolios rather than follow their leader Malcolm Turnbull in voting with Kevin Rudd's Government on a Emissions Trading Scheme.

The Liberal Party is in turmoil with the resignations of five frontbenchers from their portfolios this afternoon in protest against the emissions trading scheme.

Tony Abbott, Sophie Mirabella, Tony Smith and Senators Nick Minchin and Eric Abetz have all quit their portfolios because they cannot vote for the legislation.

Senate whip Stephen Parry has also relinquished his position...

So the anti-free speech movement is in big trouble, because more Australians say they're not going to shut up, cower in fear, or sacrifice their economic and social freedoms.

I see nothing wrong with intellectual diversity, and oppose all forms of government-driven scientific censorship. And, I recognize that blackmailing sections of the public will only last for so long. If PM Rudd continues to run on Gore's authoritarian the-debate-is-over pro-censorship platform, is he advertising his strengths or weaknesses?

Do real leaders rally against democracy to promote "good science"?


READ MORE

.

Climategate Scandal Spreads to New Zealand as American MSM Continues Ostrich Act

Subject: txt grn intl msm -
Oops! If the mainstream media was hoping that the Climategate scandal would be limited to the University of East Anglia's Climate Reasearch Unit (CRU) in Norwich, England, they are out of luck. This scandal has now reared its ugly head on the other side of the globe at New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research (NIWA) which is that nation's chief climate advisory unit.

Watts Up With That? reposting from New Zealand's TBR.cc Investigate magazine's breaking news forum explains this latest development in the widening Climategate scandal:

The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain’s CRU climate research centre.

Here is a NIWA graph of the supposed warming trend:

Mama, save me! I'm scared! But wait. Watts Up With That? provides us with a very important caveat in the form of another graph:

But analysis of the raw climate data from the same temperature stations has just turned up a very different result:

Gone is the relentless rising temperature trend, and instead there appears to have been a minimalist warming, consistent with the warming up of the planet after the end of the Little Ice Age in 1850.

The revelations are published today in a news alert from The Climate Science Coalition of NZ: [snip]

The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming, as documented below. There is nothing in the station histories to warrant these adjustments and to date Dr Salinger and NIWA have not revealed why they did this.

We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature [records].

It’s a disgrace... [It's dangerous - snip]

Pardon the interruption here but does anybody else notice how it is the much maligned blogosphere that is doing the detailed footwork that the mainstream media should, but won't, do?

So far this New Zealand scandal remains unreported in the American MSM but, to its credit, there is a report on this latest Climategate outbreak across the pond by James Delingpole the UK Telegraph.

Meanwhile, if the U.S. media ever pull their ostrich heads out of the sand [almost the words I used], they will have a huge amount of catching up to do in this scandal.

[Forget it - the MSM is part of the scam mechanism.]

READ MORE

ClimateGate Scientists Cited in Report to White House and Congress

Subject: txt grn crpt -

As such, its contents not only impact future and current legislation involving global warming, but also how tax dollars are spent to research and address it. The report began with an introduction by White House science czar John Holdren, a man directly involved in ClimateGate.

The report addressed a number of topics involving climate, and concluded with "Chapter References and Endnotes" where the following names appeared:

Phil Jones, Director of the British Climate Research Unit

Gavin Schmidt, NASA climatologist and climate modeler

Michael Mann, Penn State professor and author of the Hockey Stick graph

[among others - snip]

It is disturbing is that America's news media haven't cross-referenced this high-profile report with all the names in the e-mail messages obtained from the computers of the University of East Anglia, and reported to the American people just how connected to the United States government these people are.

Or would that be too much like [non-partisan] journalism?

READ MORE

Climategate: White House Involvement in Scandal Will Make It Harder for MSM to Ignore

Subject: txt grn msm reps libs -
Yesterday Brian Williams delivered an NBC Nightly News report about President Obama attending the Copenhagen global warming summit. Guess what hot topic was left untouched? If you had guessed Climategate you would have been correct.

Not only Williams but also the other TV networks, with the exception of FOX News, have completely ignored what is considered to be the biggest scientific scandal in history. However, new Climategate revelations made by the Canada Free Press about a White House connection to the scandal will soon make it much more difficult (and ridiculous) for the networks to ignore.

Canada Free Press editor Judi McLeod and Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball reveal the involvement of White House Science Czar John Holdren (photo) in the Climategate Scandal. The picture presented of Holdren is not a pretty one:

Obama Science Czar John Holdren is directly involved in CRU’s unfolding Climategate scandal. In fact, according to files released by a CEU hacker or whistleblower, Holdren is involved in what Canada Free Press (CFP) columnist Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball terms “a truculent and nasty manner that provides a brief demonstration of his lack of understanding, commitment on faith and willingness to ridicule and bully people”.

Baliunas and Soon were authors of excellent work confirming the existence of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) from a multitude of sources. Their work challenged attempts to get rid of the MWP because it contradicted the claim by the proponents of anthropogenic global warming (AGW). Several scientists challenged the claim that the latter part of the 20th century was the warmest ever. They knew the claim was false, many warmer periods occurred in the past.

Michael Mann ‘got rid’ of the MWP with his production of the hockey stick, but Soon and Baliunas were problematic. What better than have a powerful academic destroy their credibility for you? Sadly, there are always people who will do the dirty work... [snip]

Such as a certain person was destined to become a White House Science Czar...

[You need to read this to know the type of people we're dealing with here - MUST READ > ]

READ MORE

Climate change 'isn't caused by us'

Subject: txt grn owg -
limate change has mainly natural causes and the human contribution is too small to detect, said global warming expert Professor Fred Singer.

He told a debate in London organised by the free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, the climate has not warmed in the past decade, despite the fact carbon dioxide was increasing rapidly. Singer, of the science and environmental policy project at the University of Virginia, told the event the climate has both warmed and cooled over the past century. Burning fossil fuels had enriched the atmosphere with carbon dioxide, because it was what plants live on.

"Maybe we should thank the Chinese for putting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere instead of worrying about it,"

Singer said one school of thought was the warming of the earth in the 20th century was caused by humans, though greenhouse gases, but he believes that while there must be a human contribution it was not detectable, as it was too small.

He suggested people should be suspicious of any science where there was a consensus and concluded:

"I am not worried about climate change, not at all. We know how to adapt to climate change better than our ancestors, we have the means to adapt to both cold and warm climates.

"The only thing I am scared of is politicians who in their zeal to 'save the climate' will introduce policies that will ruin the economy."

Former chancellor Nigel Lawson, who has set up a think tank called the Global Warming Policy foundation, said technology for adaptation has never been better, and there are huge benefits from a warming planet, including for health and food production. Even if global agreement was reached to decarbonise, it would slow down growth in the world, including in developing countries.

"You are condemning tens and tens of millions in the developing world to unnecessary poverty, malnutrition and premature death and disease."

However, Dr Sam Fankhauser of London School of Economics, a member of the UK Committee on Climate Change, said a target of 50 per cent cut in emissions was both sensible and achievable.

Scientists were 90 per cent sure there was a problem, and it would be unwise and careless not to take precautionary measures.

But the IPCC has no scientific evidence and the theory relies solely on the output of climate models that according to the information in table 2.11 of the 2007 report cannot possibly be accurate.

Surely Dr Fankhauser knows that opinions aren't evidence and that scientific truth isn't determined by votes.

[But the issue's been hijacked by politics, which works precisely that way.

They most costly and liberty restricting scam in history.]

READ MORE

.

Climategate: how they all squirm

[Credit where due - the field of professional journalism is not yet completely devoid of professional journalists...]

Among the many great amusements of the Climategate scandal are the myriad imaginative excuses being offered by the implicated scientists and their friends in the MSM as to why this isn’t a significant story. Here are some of the best:

Most Unexpectedly Honourable Response: The Guardian’s eco-columnist George Monbiot

Say what you like about the Great Moonbat, the heliophobic Old Stoic is the ONLY member of the Climate-Fear-Promotion camp to have delivered a proper apology.

"I apologise. I was too trusting of some of those who provided the evidence I championed. I would have been a better journalist if I had investigated their claims more closely..."

[long list of hilarious, or frightening, responses to what should be the bursting of the AWG scam...]

RED MORE

[And in 2090?]

.

NYT: Young Scientist 'Disheartened' by Climategate; Core Problems Ignored

Subject: txt grn msm -

"Based upon feedback that I’ve received from graduate students at Georgia Tech, I suspect that you are confused, troubled, or worried by what you have been reading about ClimateGate.

What has been noticeably absent so far in the ClimateGate discussion is a public reaffirmation by climate researchers of our basic research values: the rigors of the scientific method (including reproducibility), research integrity and ethics, open minds, and critical thinking.

Under no circumstances should we ever sacrifice any of these values; the CRU emails, however, appear to violate them."

What's notably lacking in Revkin's report, Curry's letter, and many other Climategate-related establishment media reports is any willingness to entertain the notion that the scandal completely undermines the scientific basis for the argument that AGW (anthropogenic global warming) is occurring.

It seems that no one will dare say that the pathetic state of the data described in the leaked e-mails and the demonstrated willingness of those who control it to massage it hollows out the entire core of the AGW argument.

Given that those caught red-handed cooking the books and playing hide-and-seek with the data have yet to see any meaningful sanctions or discipline for what they have done, students would logically fear that if they fight for scientific values when they are compromised by political factors, they will be fighting alone and ostracized by their peers...

READ MORE

.

MSM Goes to Ridiculous Lengths to Avoid Climategate by Ignoring IPCC Chairman Response to Scandal

Subject: txt grn owg msm bias -

Big news on the Climategate front.

The chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Dr. Rajendra K. Pachauri, has issued a major response to the Climategate scandal. As a result a big rift has developed between the IPCC and a delegate to that organization on the topic of Climategate. This is big news, is it not? Does this not sound like a huge news story? Well, guess how many MSM reporters have covered this story? The answer as of this moment is one.

One.

The sole reporter who went where the rest of the MSM dares not tread was Andrew Revkin, the New York Times environmental reporter, who covered this story in his Dot Earth blog. Revkin is hardly what one would call a global warming "denier" or realists but to give him credit he will report on breaking climate stories even if contradicts the prevailing MSM agenda on this topic.

And his latest report covers both the IPCC chairman's response as well as the huge rift over Climategate that has now developed as resuult of that scandal:

Rajendra K. Pachauri, the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has distributed a statement on the unauthorized disclosure of thousands of e-mail messages and documents involving a variety of contributors to the panel’s reports.

The numerous emails, particularly those related to the seemingly orchestrated machinations of the climate panel, have been the subject of much discussion...

In them, Phil Jones, the now-embattled head of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, the source of the leaked files, discusses several papers that challenge the status quo with Michael Mann, a longtime colleague from Pennsylvania State University. This is the take-home line, now reverberating around skeptics’ Web sites:

I can’t see either of these papers being in the next I.P.C.C. report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!

Here’s Dr. Pachauri’s statement defending the climate panel’s procedures: [snip] Dr. Pachauri goes on at great length defending the IPCC peer review process which you can read in the rest of Revkin's report.

However, if it weren't newsworthy enough that the IPCC chairman has responded to the Climategate scandal at length, it turns out that a delegate of that organization strongly disagrees with the chairman's assessment of the scandal.

Here is the reaction to the IPCC chairman's response to Climategate from Saudi Arabia's liaison to that organization, Mohammad Al-Sabban. Note that he does not use vague diplomatic language in his very direct reaction to the position of IPCC chairman:

A lot of damage has already been done to this international scientific body and I do not think the attached response by Dr. Pachauri was convincing enough to remove such a damage.

So there you have it. The IPCC chairman gives a lengthy response to the Climategate and a liaison to that organization claims a lot of damage has been caused by that scandal and is unsatisfied with the excuses provided.

And yet the MSM still does not think this worthy of coverage? The lengths that the MSM has gone to avoid mentioning Climategate has now entered the realm of the absurd.

It is the scandal that dare not speak its name as far as the MSM is concerned. Of course, they risk embarrassing themselves yet again if Climategate explodes as an issue at the Copenhagen summit which President Obama will be attending.

Then the MSM, as in the case of the ACORN and Van Jones scandals, will have to go through the embarrassing task of explaining to its readers and viewers what Climategate is all about even though most folks familiar with the Web would have already known all about it...no thanks to their ridiculous non-reporting of this major event.

Oh, and a big round of applause to Andrew Revkin for reporting on all aspects of climate news...including Climategate.

READ MORE

Big Lies and Little Facts

Subject: txt grn msm bias -

"This should be considered not merely a scientific scandal but an enormous journalistic scandal,"

National Review's Jonah Goldberg writes about the still-unfolding revelations of dishonesty by global-warmist scientists (noted here yesterday).

It's a critical point: The elite press are trying to portray skepticism about global warming as a mental defect....

READ MORE

WaPo: Climate Schemers 'Under Attack' By Skeptics Who Dare to Question

Subject: txt grn msm bias -
The release of internal emails from Britain's University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit shows scientists plotting to ostracize and marginalize other researchers who question their assumptions on anthropogenic global warming.

Yet the Washington Post finds that such a strategy is but a natural reaction to questions of these scientists by climate skeptics...

[I.e. , in all things claim victimhood - and half the folks will be distracted by it every time.]

READ MORE

Networks That Jumped at Complaints About a ‘Deniers’ ‘Conspiracy’ Now Silent About Left’s Global Warming Distortions

Subject: txt grn msm -
In 2007, as Brent Baker chronicled at the time in the MRC's CyberAlert, the broadcast network evening newscasts jumped to hype a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing meant to publicize a report from two far-left groups about how the Bush administration supposedly suppressed science about the dire threat of global warming — as if that view wasn’t getting plenty of play in the mainstream media... [snip]

Yesterday, the New York Times ran a front-page story about the exposure of the censorious tactics of left-wing climate scientists..

... but none of the networks chose to notice it ...

[I.e., the NYT is more creditable than TV - think about that.]

READ MORE

.

PLEASE REMEMBER

Subject: txt grn msm bdd -
SELECTIVE SECRECY

Here’s a dirty little secret about The New York Times. It likes to leak things. Important things. Things that change the course of the public conversation. From the Pentagon Papers to the ruined terrorist-surveillance programs of the Bush era, the Times has routinely found that secrecy is a danger and sunlight is a disinfectant. Until now.

A hacker recently released e-mails going to and from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Britain, e-mails that exposed how the "scientific experts" cited so often by the media on global warming display are guilty of crude political talk, attempts at censoring opponents, and twisting scientific data to support their policy agenda. But, according to the NYT;

"The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they won’t be posted here."

Funny, that rule didn’t apply to things like the disclosure of the SWIFT global bank monitoring program against terrorists - despite their grave implications to our terror-fighting efforts and national security.

No, here there is only a danger of shredding the undeserved reputation of some global-warming alarmists as partisan, ideological non-scientists pushing a preconceived environmentalist and statist agenda to everyone's detriment - but 'propriety' is now paramount... [snip]

This kind of censor-your-opponents activity ought to disgust a journalist who values openness and rigorous debate above all. Every day the networks avoid this story, they’re saying they don’t really care about either of those values.

In fact, they become willing accomplices in a coverup of global proportions.

[Again, the most pervasive spin: omission. If you're getting your news from TV, you aren't.]

READ MORE

ClimateGate Ignored, Again -- Broadcast Nets Go with State Dinner Menu, Sea Lions and Pete the Moose

Subject: txt grn msm -
It probably won't come as any surprise, but coverage of the ClimateGate scandal, which involved the Climate Research Unit at University of East Anglia in Britain suffering a breach of data, was nowhere to be found.

READ MORE

'Global Warming Meltdown' Article Pulled

Subject: txt grn msm -
On Nov. 20th Startribune.com had a nice article about the hacked emails called "A Global Warming Meltdown" written by by Andrew C. Revkin, of the New York Times.

The article talked about how the emails revealed that scientists were using statistical "tricks" to make charts show a recent sharp warming trend. I went to find that article today on their website and it is gone, it seems to have been pulled.

Despite a high number of other sites having being linked to this article, all paths now result only in this 404 error message...

READ MORE

CNN FINALLY Reports ClimateGate -- To Downplay It

Subject: txt grn msm -
It only took CNN six days to notice the growing international scandal known as Climategate, and when it finally reported on the matter, it predictably did so by downplaying the significance...

Is that what CNN considers a good report on this subject?

Maybe they should take a tip from Russia Today which logged the following the same day: [HIGHLY RECOMMENDED > ]

[select image to play]

[In which they point out that the 'reports' from University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) in Norwich, England, are the primary basis for IPCC 'data' on which this canard is based, and the numerous calls (everywhere but here) for the resignation of the principle parties -- i.e., real reporting on the subject...]

READ MORE

Has ClimateGate Changed Obama's Global Warming Strategy?

Subject: txt grn owg libs reps crpt msm -
Has the emerging international ClimateGate scandal changed President Obama's global warming strategy?

Just the opposite; its been taken as a sign to ratchet up his rhetoric in support of CO2 curbing controls...

Within days of the ClimateGate scandal breaking, Obama [not] surprisingly announced that he's going to Copenhagen with a pledge for serious carbon dioxide emissions cuts.

Coincidence?

Not likely, for the White House either realizes that the current momentum against cap-and-trade legislation needs to be halted quickly if it's ever going to get passed, and they needed to divert attention on the subject of global warming away from the growing scandal.

After all, as e-mail messages and documents obtained from the computers of Britain's Climate Research Unit continue to be analyzed, it seems likely that more revelations damaging to scientists involved as well as to the global warming myth are going to surface - such as American Thinker's Marc Sheppard already uncovered source code in CRU documents clearly used to manipulate climate data - more such discoveries seem a metaphysical certitude.

With calls out for CRU director Phil Jones to resign or be fired, such occurring while the Copenhagen conference produces absolutely nothing could be close to a death knell for the entire climate alarmism movement. So the President is relying on his proven allies in the MSM to simply misdirect America's attention to his grand plans for combating a problem ... that increasingly seems doesn't exist...

READ MORE

LAT Breaking: Obama Going to Copenhagen, No Mention of Climategate

Subject: txt grn msm -
READ MORE

World leaders spur on climate debate

Subject: txt grn -
PORT OF SPAIN — World leaders sought on Friday to spur on the global-warming debate ahead of a Copenhagen climate conference that has been fired up by pledges from China and the United States to cut emissions.

The UN is seeking a common stance for the talks in Copenhagen. [i.e., all 'debate' must center on how severely to saddle developed countries with growth impediments with no discussion on the irrefutable evidence that the problem they' re to 'combat' doesn't exist. So much for 'meaningful talks'.]

Fears that the conference starting December 7 would fail to reach a deal were eased this week with pledges by Beijing and Washington. The offers by the world's two biggest greenhouse gas emitters were widely hailed, even if there were questions over how effective they would be.

The United States said it was aiming to curb emissions by 17 percent from 2005 levels by 2020. [not, possible.]
US President Barack Obama will also present at Copenhagen longer-term pledges of a 30 percent reduction in emissions by 2025, 42 percent by 2030 and 83 percent by 2050 [from inane to insane].

China said that by 2020, it would cut the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per unit of gross domestic product (GDP) by 40 to 45 percent compared to 2005 levels. .

China's Communist Party leadership pledged Friday to "actively" tackle climate change while sticking to its economic expansion.

Experts said however that while China was touting its plan as a "major contribution" to the struggle against climate change, its already massive greenhouse gas emissions will still rise for years to come.

"We think it represents a relatively small move away from business-as-usual for China and still implies quite a large growth in emissions,"

[But its real goal is to force the US to commit its political suicide - and it will work perfectly unless we the people stop this scam when Congress is called on to ratify any related 'treaty'.]

READ MORE

.

Summit of Self-Interests

Subject: txt grn intl bdd -
Fewer than 50% of British people believe there is a genuine climate problem caused by humans. And of that 50% most have no idea what the science says anyway. Same goes for the USA and most other countries. Nor do the leaders of those countries know the extent of worldwide concern, that nations are stripping their assets to follow unproven science. Or, more likely, they are ignoring it.

There is the general delusion that climate change is caused by CO2 even though the science says otherwise. There is also the general delusion that man can change climate by altering his CO2 emissions. This is another fallacy, unproven by science.

So, what is [really] going on? [snip]

Yet, economies are being driven to collapse by relying totally on only one side of the argument. The evidence suggests this is deliberate. Laws and policies that control and remove freedoms of choice are being produced at break-neck speed. People are now unable to heat their homes, or travel far. And there is inordinate taxation.

But, there is no natural shortage of oil – there is more oil ready to be tapped than ever before! There are plenty of fossil fuels – coal and gas.

And green taxes go to pay for… well, nothing in particular… ask government what the money actually pays for. You’ll find the answer is quite nebulous and unscientific...[snip]

This means that leaders who attend the Summit represent only themselves and their own interests. They certainly do not represent their peoples. Why are governments pushing the green agenda? It has nothing at all to do with ‘saving the planet’.

The sole reason is power and money. Behind the whole enterprise is socialism, and a struggle to create a one world government.

Both Gordon Brown and Barack Obama have openly said so...

READ MORE.

Fighting Global Warming ‘Requires Balancing the World’s Needs with America’s’

Subject: txt grn intl owg -
The the three broadcast network evening newscasts on Wednesday informed viewers that President Obama has decided to attend the United Nations climate conference in Copenhagen – while ignoring news of Climategate...


– but the NBC Nightly News uniquely devoted a full story to Obama’s intention to take part in the conference, and the underlying assumption that it's America's fault and so we should be willing to sacrifice our welfare on the alter of global wealth redistribution...

['Social euthanasia' - apt.]

READ MORE

A Political Who's Who of Global Warming Liars

Subject: txt grn intl owg bdd msm -
As the global warming fraud unravels, it’s a good time to look at the politicians who have been some of the most outspoken advocates, using global warming/climate change to advance “Cap-and-Trade” legislation and other related laws and regulations.

Top of the list is President Barack Obama who has made many references to “climate change” and “global warming” to further this national and international fraud. He’ll pick up his Nobel Peace Prize in December; the same one given to Al Gore and the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change a few years back. Further proof of his mendacity will be his attendance at the UN Climate Change Conference in Denmark.

Speaking on World Environment Day last June, Obama said of global warming,

“We’re going to have to make some tough decisions and take concrete actions if we are going to deal with a potentially cataclysmic disaster.”

This mirrors years of similar doomsday statements by former Vice President Al Gore.

This is the kind of drivel Americans and others around the world have heard from their supposed “leaders” for far too long...

READ MORE

.

Politics and Greenhouse Gases

Subject: txt grn engry crpt bdd msm -
Advocates and sympathetic politicians claiming that man-made global warming from use of carbon-based energy sources mandates international controls on economically prosperous nations were already worried that their victory is slipping. Now another blow has been struck against the basic "science" used to support their case.

Following an extensive theoretical analysis, two German physicists have determined that the term greenhouse gas is a misnomer and that the greenhouse effect appears to violate basic laws of physics.

The book Climate Confusion, points out how man-made global warming alarmists attempt to mislead the public by claiming that global CO2 emissions total about 50 billion tons per year while failing to acknowledge that the total weight of the atmosphere is 5 quadrillion tons. In other words, the 50 billion tons adds to 5 million billion tons, or a mere 10 parts per million -- relatively speaking, a trivial change each year.

They call the terms greenhouse effect and greenhouse gases "deliberate misnomers" and a "myth beyond physical reality" and conclude:

In summary, there is no atmospheric greenhouse effect, in particular CO2-greenhouse effect, in theoretical physics and engineering thermodynamics. Thus it is illegitimate to deduce predictions which provide a consulting solution for economics and intergovernmental policy.

Thus, scientific support for the man-made global warming hoax slowly collapses while politicians rush to lock in massive international wealth-redistribution in its name.

Those pesky "greenhouse gases" just don't behave in a politically correct manner.

[Dramatic I know, but the CO2 canard is the mechanism by which it can, and will if not stopped, come to pass.

So... ]

.

"OPPOSE ALL CO2 RESTRICTIONS OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES"


Whitehouse: mailto:president@whitehouse.gov
Senate-Reid: http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
House-Pelosi: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
YOUR Senator: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
YOUR Congressman: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

or: Speed Message them with your personal distribution list...

and as always, pass it on...

contact-template