Wednesday, November 12, 2008

President Honors Veterans, Families at USS Intrepid Ceremony

[Belated but heart felt]


WASHINGTON, Nov. 11, 2008 – On his last Veterans Day as commander in chief, President Bush paid tribute to all those who have worn the uniform of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast Guard during a speech at the USS Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in New York City.

"Today we send a clear message to all who have worn the uniform: Thank you for your courage, thank you for your sacrifice, and thank you for standing up when your nation needed you most.

"The war on terror has required courage; it has required resolve equal to what previous generations of Americans brought to the fields of Europe and the deep waters of the Pacific, and I'm proud to report to my fellow citizens, our armed forces -- the armed forces of this generation -- have showed up for the fight, and America is more secure for it."

"They are representative of the finest our nation offers. And they have the support of strong and caring and loving families," he continued. "And so on this Veterans Day, not only do we honor those who have worn the uniform, those who are wearing the uniform -- we honor their families."
During his speech, Bush noted that he is often asked what he's going to miss about the presidency once he leaves office.

"The truth of the matter is, I will miss being the commander-in-chief of such a fabulous group of men and women -- those who wear the uniform of the United States military,"
he said.

READ MORE

American Troops Still in Harm's Way?


Oh yeah. Them.

When was the last time you saw American soldiers being interviewed in prime time? When was the last time you saw wall-to-wall coverage of the NYC ticker-tape parades in our soldiers' honor? When was the last time you heard an American newsman even acknowledge that we're still fighting (and WINNING!) a war?

What in tarnation is happening to this great Country? But never fear, real people are here to do the real work that needs to be done.

Operation Gratitude continues their valiant effort to give a little thanks where thanks is more than due. Thousands and thousands of all-volunteer homefront support forces are gathering from sunup to sundown every day of the week to get care packages to every man and woman in uniform still in harm's way.

This year's holiday package drive has been under way for months now. Volunteers work tirelessly packing each box with goodies, letters and genuine love.

Now this is newsworthy.

Now they're ok...

WASHINGTON — President Bush leaves President-elect Obama broad latitude for covert action in countries with which the United States is not at war, powers that Obama could scale back along with other Bush presidential orders now under consideration for rescinding.

But he's not likely to do that.

Obama already has telegraphed his willingness to exercise those powers if he deems them necessary.

Obama said in an August speech that he would target high-value terrorists in Pakistan without that government's permission.

"Rescinding blanket orders would limit Obama's flexibility and proscribe the ability of U.S. intelligence and military forces to capture or kill wanted terrorists..."
[right. These policies, headlined as 'Nazi like' again and again when under Bush's authority are now magically good things if they provide Obama the necessary 'flexibility' and avoid 'proscribing' the ability of US intelligence. ufb. And no one in the press will call them on their shameless hypocrisy.]

READ MORE

Captured battle plan shows strength and training of Taleban forces


Tang Khata, Bajaur - The map tells a war story of its own. Sketched by a Taleban commander, it is of a stretch of territory fought over in Bajaur between the Pakistani Army and the insurgents. The ground has been neatly divided into specific areas of responsibility for different Taleban units. (Snip) ''If I were going to pick the next attack to hit the United States, it would come out of Fata,'' Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, said recently.

Fata, that's Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas. Terrorist wannabes from all over the world flock there as long as the Taliban and al Qaeda aren't dislodged and destroyed. The worry is that some might have already left and formed trained cells to carry out missions in the West.

READ MORE

Iran seen test-firing new missile near Iraq

TEHRAN - Iran has test-fired a new type of missile during war games near the Iraqi border, state television said on Tuesday, after warning the United States it would respond to any violation of Iranian airspace.

The English-language Press TV said the Iranian-made missile, named as the Samen, was successfully tested on Monday by the elite Revolutionary Guards in the western border city of Marivan.

READ MORE

Disconcerting NYT editorial about American Jews and Israel

The tone of this editorial in today's NYT is more than a little disconcerting. Aside from the rote "Israel strangling Palestinian economy" and casting doubt on Israeli sincerity to restrain settlers comes this statement:

As a step toward peace, Israel must freeze all settlements and reduce the roadblocks in the West Bank that are strangling the Palestinian economy. To do so, the Israeli government needs the public support of American Jews and moderate Israelis against militants who seek political change through violence.

This seems a roundabout way to place responsibility for Palestinian problems on American Jews who support Israel. To me this is an unwarranted implicit accusation that raises qualms on several levels (the dual loyalty canard, the conflating of American Jews with Israelis, the belief that American Jews are all-powerful, the scapegoating of American Jews for problems in the Middle East).

Furthermore, tens of millions of Christians support Israel and the American-Israel alliance. Israeli actions are not the responsibility of America's few million Jews (some of whom are Israel's harshest critics).

READ MORE

[meanwhile...]

Israel to continue Gaza fuel cutoff
Defense Minister Ehud Barak decided not to resume fuel shipments to the Gaza Strip on Monday because of continued rocket fire, defense officials said, and Gaza officials threatened to shut down the territory's only power plant. [snip]

The defense officials said fuel shipments could resume Tuesday if no more rockets are fired...

[the spin on this issue is insulting. imagine Mexico firing rockets into the US and our only reply was to close the border until they stopped, at which time we'd reopen it without additional consequence. Israel's patients with their local terrorists is astounding - it is a tiny democracy surrounded by terrorist regimes wanting to annihilate it, yet in the world press (and UN) it is forever the bad guy. disgusting. ]

READ MORE


‘Apartheid’ Israel, Islamophobia on the Agenda for U.N. Racism Meeting


Seven years after the United States and Israel withdrew in protest from a United Nations racism gathering, the drafters of the primary document for a follow-up conference next spring have included sentiments that prompted the earlier walkout.

Most glaringly, the draft text declares that Israeli policies and practices in territories claimed by the Palestinians constitute

“a new kind of apartheid, a crime against humanity [and] a form of genocide."
The 2009 conference aims to review the progress made since the U.N. World Conference on Racism (WCAR) in Durban, South Africa in 2001, which critics said was so focused on Israel that other issues of serious racial discrimination around the globe were all but ignored.

Despite the controversy that dogged that event, the Israeli-Palestinian issue is once again looming, while another topic promising to make waves at the event is “defamation” of religion – primarily Islam.

Both are being promoted by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the bloc of Islamic states that accounts for one-third of the members of the U.N.’s Human Rights Council, the body overseeing preparations for the racism conference.

The Bush administration has sat out of the Human Rights Council since its establishment in 2006, accusing it of disproportionately targeting Israel and of protecting rights-violating regimes. But a senior State Department official told lawmakers early this year it would be the next administration’s decision - and Obama is expected to seek membership next May... [snip]

Anne Bayefsky of Eye on the U.N., a project of the Hudson Institute, believes the next administration probably will also decide to attend the racism conference.

“President-elect Obama has a grossly naive attitude towards the U.N. and its ability to foster American interests, he is therefore likely to run for election on the morally bankrupt U.N. Human Rights Council, as a means of pandering for votes for the Council election which will take place shortly thereafter.”
Bayefsky highlighted four main areas of concern in the latest version of a draft “outcome document,” being prepared for the conference next spring. She identified them as “the demonization of Israel,

” attacks on freedom of expression, attempts to thwart counterterrorism measures, and “alleged discrimination against Muslims."
The organization’s executive director, Hillel Neuer, said the dominant theme of the draft outcome document

“is that the United States, Western Europe, Israel and the other liberal democracies – their principles, institutions, policies, respective histories and national identities – are singularly racist and discriminatory against Islam".

[all points elaborated on in full - Highly Recommended > this is the 'world government' in action]

READ MORE


[FLASHBACK NNBriefs:
The Pathology of Durban II
Time for U.S. to reject U.N.'s anti-democratic conference
Canada expected to back out of UN racism conference


"because countries that are classified as less than democratic hold a majority in the general assembly" - where they exercise what they don't grant others, to our perpetual detriment. The organization has morphed into a gaming mechanism for despots - which we finance - it needs go (or we from it)"
see all three here.

Finally: I know you're all sick of this topic given the pervasive 24/7 coverage by the MSM, but let's play it safe by assuring our new President-Elect is aware of our sentiments before he acts on the matter:

'Boycott Durban 2!'
http://obama.senate.gov/contact/


and please, pass this on {white envelope below left} to friends and family - thank you.]
.

Most affluent voters key to Obama edge

Barack Obama promised he would lower taxes for 95 percent of Americans and presumably raise them for the 5 percent who benefited most under President Bush’s tax policies. But, remarkably, the most affluent 5 percent supported Obama and that was perhaps the key to his victory last week.

This group — and the rise of a new elite class of voters — is at the heart of the fast-paced changes in demographics affecting the political, sociological and economic landscape of the country.

While there has been some inflation over the past 12 years, the exit poll demographics show that the fastest growing group of voters in America has been those making over $100,000 a year in income. In 1996, only 9 percent of the electorate said their family income was that high. Last week it had grown to 26 percent — more than one in four voters. And those making over $75,000 are up to 15 percent from 9 percent.

The poorest segment of the electorate, those making under $15,000, has shrunk from 11 percent to 6 percent over the past dozen years. And those making $15,000 to $30,000 annually — the working poor — also shrunk from 23 percent to 12 percent of the electorate.


[my, aren't those some interesting statistics, in {huge!} percentages mind you, of the consequences of the "failed Bush policies". I.e., they voted for 'cool', not realizing what they're jeopardizing]

READ MORE

Conservatives didn't lose election, GOP did

COLUMBIA, South Carolina (CNN) -- For all Americans, this election represents another glass ceiling broken, and in the words of my 16-year-old, "That's very cool." The election of the first black president is an inspiring and transformational moment for our country.

I am happy for President-elect Barack Obama, and for many who supported him. They and, in many cases, their ancestors fought for this day for centuries as they experienced first-hand the unthinkable wrong of segregation. As an American, I wish him every success. [snip]

I believe in the Biblical notion of taking the log out of your own eye before worrying about the splinter in someone else's. Accordingly, let me focus on my own party and the way Ted Stevens personifies what went wrong in the election...

[I.e., Reagan wouldn't fold, he'd fight {and the 'cool' reference came soon after I'd penned the prior quip}]

READ MORE

What Would Reagan Do?

This is not the first time that conservatives and Republicans have stared into an electoral abyss. After Barry Goldwater's crushing 1964 defeat, most political observers thought the only future for the GOP was to become a centrist party only slightly to the right of Great Society Democrats.

Ronald Reagan didn't agree.

In a trenchant column penned in the Dec. 1, 1964 issue of National Review, he argued that Americans had rejected only a false vision of conservatism as a radical departure from the status quo. Conservatives, he said, had only "lost a battle in the continuing war for freedom." Voters would rally to the conservative banner once they realized that Democratic liberals were the true radicals.

His article is striking for what he said -- and didn't say. Reagan spoke of a "war for freedom," but he did not mention a single specific conservative policy. Rather, he defended conservatism's salience by arguing that

"we represent the forgotten American -- that simple soul who goes to work, bucks for a raise, takes out insurance, pays for his kids' schooling, contributes to his church and charity and knows there just 'ain't no such thing as a free lunch"

This vision of conservatism would succeed by pointing out how liberal values diverged from the American consensus, and by attracting to conservatism average Americans -- the Reagan Democrats...

[time will tell if the Republican party retains anyone smart enough to realize that 'liberalism light' loses to liberalism-radical every time - but can be countered with true conservatism, to which most Americans subscribe...
{see: NNBrief of 081110 re: election data showing Republicans staying home last Tuesday > http://netizennewsbrief.blogspot.com/2008/11/that-huge-voter-turnout-didnt-happen.html]


READ MORE

[Meanwhile, in our 'professional' media...]

Time Magazine (Again) Impatiently Declares ‘End of Reagan Era’

Once again — perhaps this time hoping that they are right — Time magazine has ostentatiously declared: “The End of the Reagan Era.” In the November 17 “commemorative edition,” the magazine features a piece by historian Richard Norton Smith explaining how “the Age of the Gipper ends with Obama’s election.”

But we’ve seen this movie before...


[multiple times before - they probably believe it this time too...


that's fine.
.