Monday, October 26, 2009

Public option for Congress

Subject: txt 1st hcare -
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) submitted three versions of a public option in healthcare to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to be scored. Not one of them includes a query on cost or savings to taxpayers should Congress subject itself to the taxpayer-funded government plan commonly referred to as the “public option,” not to be confused with the fully tricked-out Cadillac plans they now have, for which we, the taxpayers, are footing the bill.

The public option should not be optional for Congress. It should be mandatory.

Congress is already on a publicly funded plan more generous than almost any private plan offered anywhere in the United States. But why shouldn’t they be on the same public plan they have in store for their fellow citizens? Is it too much to ask for Pelosi, et al, to put their money where their mouth is? (Or rather, our money?)

[Stop debating details - government run health 'care' needs be avoided in its entirety if we're to retain our civil liberties.]

READ MORE


image toon - 1st hcare = Obycare distinguishes between taxpayers and politicians

No comments: