Thursday, July 30, 2009


GOP BILL PROMOTES CITIZEN CONTROL


Members of the Republican Study Committee are putting forward their own piece of legislation for health care reform, a summary of which was provided exclusively to CBSNews.com's Washington Unplugged.

While Democrats are focusing on creating something like a government-sponsored health insurance plan and regulating the health insurance market, the Republican


"Empowering Patients First Act,"

which Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) will introduce tomorrow, instead promotes the individual insurance market as well as employer-based markets. Instead of focusing on regulating private insurers, the plan would in fact give them more freedom to work across state lines. Republicans say the plan will be paid for by reforms of defensive medicine, creating a more efficient health care system, and overall reductions in non-defense government spending.

"Liability reform has to be one or the hallmarks of a bill," ... "We make certain we pay for our bill by making this a priority."

Expanding Coverage in Employer-Based and Individual Markets

According to the summary, the bill aims to make health care accessible to all Americans by creating tax incentives for consumers to purchase insurance on the individual market, encouraging states to assist consumers with pre-existing conditions, and promoting the employer-based insurance system that is popular with many Americans.

"It's imperative each and every American have the access to health coverage that they select," ... "The way you do that is through the tax code to make it financially feasible."

The Republican proposal would extend the income tax deduction on health care premiums to those who purchase coverage in the individual market. By contrast, several others -- ranging from Republican Sen. John McCain to Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden-- have proposed eliminating the deductions all together; that idea, however, has remained unpopular.

In the Republican plan, low-income consumers would also be eligible for advanceable, refundable tax credits, provided on a sliding scale, to purchase coverage in the individual market.

In order to provide coverage for Americans who have pre-existing conditions, the Republican plan proposes giving states incentives, such as federal block grants, to establish high-risk insurance pools. Comparatively, Democrats have proposed regulating insurance companies to prohibit them from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.

To promote the employer-based health insurance system, the Republican plan proposes giving small businesses tax incentives for auto-enrolling employees in a plan. Many companies already auto-enroll their employees. The plan also calls for allowing workers to define their own contributions to an employer-sponsored plan. Employers would als be encouraged to offer discounts for healthy habits through wellness and prevention programs

Republicans are also proposing to expand the individual market by creating pooling mechanisms such as association health plans and individual membership accounts. Consumers would also be able to shop for insurance across state lines. They would be able to obtain more information about different plans through state-based health plan portals the Republican plan proposes creating.


Medicaid and Medicare

The Republican plan also proposes reforming Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) by giving beneficiaries the option of getting a voucher to purchase private insurance. Mr. Obama, in fact, wants to lessen encouragement for private insurer participation in government-run programs like Medicaid and Medicare -- he has proposed eliminating subsidies for private insurers to participate in Medicare Advantage.

The Republican plan also reforms Medicaid by dictating that states must cover 90 percent of those below 200 percent of the federal poverty level before they can expand eligibility levels under Medicaid and SCHIP.

Republicans and Democrats agree the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), a formula Congress created to keep Medicare costs under control, needs to be reformed. Without reform, doctors could face a pay cut in Medicare reimbursements of about 20 percent. The Republican plan would rebase the SGR and create two separate conversion factors for primary care and all other services.


Cost Containment

Republican and Democratic ideas about health care reform perhaps differ most substantially on the issue of cost containment. Most of the reforms proposed in the bill, the summary says, would be paid for by decreasing defensive medicine [aka, tort reform]; savings from health care efficiencies; reducing waste, fraud and abuse; and an annual one-percent non-defense discretionary spending step down.

The plan touches on Mr. Obama's proposal to further implement comparative effectiveness research (CER) as a means of reducing waste, which is very controversial. CER attempts to use research and scientific evidence to conclude which health care treatments are most cost effective. The president already instituted the idea through the the stimulus package, which created the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research to coordinate CER across the federal government.

The Republican health care proposal would require that none of the suggestions from the Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research be finalized unless done in consultation with and approved by medical specialty societies. It would also establish performance-based quality measures endorsed by the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) and physician specialty organizations.

The Republican plan also addresses the issue of medical liabilities that doctors face -- something Democrats have not addressed. It would establish in each state administrative health care tribunals, also known as health courts, and add affirmative defense through provider established best practice measures. It would encourage the speedy resolution of claims and caps non-economic damages.

Price said today on Washington Unplugged that the August recess will give Americans the chance to compare and contrast Republican and Democratic plans.

"If we go home over August and talk to the patients of America, we wil have a better product in the fall," ..."The American people will select solutions that will put them in charge, not the government."

READ MORE

[But it must make a 'buzz' when introduced - so it's important we contact our representatives today ...


"SUPPORT 'EMPOWERING PATIENTS FIRST ACT"


House-Pelosi: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
YOUR Congressman: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

or: Speed Message them with your personal distribution list...

and as always, pass it on... [select to forward this Brief by email].

.

[not yet]
.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009


image toon - 1st fnn vals = Oby snares change-balloon on Gates wires

Devolution: AP Waters Down Obama-Gates-Crowley

Watching Associated Press reports evolve, or as is all too often the case, devolve, can be a revealing exercise.

Example: What happened between 8 p.m. Friday and 8 a.m. Saturday that would have caused the Associated Press and writer Nancy Benac to water down the headline and opening paragraphs of their story about the Obama-Gates-Crowley situation from this ....



.... to this?



Why, 12 hours later, when there are no known developments in the story, is the situation no longer one that Obama "helped fire" or "stoke"?

While the AP headline writers and Benac eased up on Obama, Benac didn't lighten up on Obama critics, as the following paragraphs from each report demonstrate... [snip]

The current AP dynamic link is here, so readers can see if and/or how Benac's story further devolves.

READ MORE


image toon - 1st fnn vals reps libs = Acted Stupidly so scaping OBY sticker off car

Did the CIA 'Cook the Books' on Iran?

.
Thanks to a brilliant piece of journalism by German investigative reporter Bruno Schirra published in the July 20 edition of The Wall Street Journal Europe, we have evidence to suggest that the 2007 NIE's conclusion about Iran's nuclear bomb program [having been halted] wasn't merely wrong, but corrupt.

Simply put, while our country's intelligence service believed that Iran had abandoned its nuclear bomb program in 2003, Germany's intelligence service was amassing evidence that the Iranian bomb program was ongoing. This raises three obvious and crucially important questions:

  • Was our country's intelligence service aware of the BND's evidence and conclusions when its analysts wrote that 2007 NIE about Iran?
  • If not, why not?
  • If our intelligence service was aware of the BND's evidence and conclusions, then how and why did the authors of that 2007 NIE reach the opposite conclusion about Iran's nuclear bomb program?
It is inconceivable to me that senior officials of our intelligence service were unaware of the BND's evidence and conclusions about Iran's nuclear bomb program. On the other hand, if our intelligence officials were aware of the BND's evidence and conclusions, why did we reach the opposite conclusion?

Did they just ignore the BND's evidence because they didn't like it and because our intelligence officials wanted to throw a banana peel under President Bush's feet?

A nuclear-armed Iran threatens our national survival, and that to meet this threat President Obama and his advisers need the best possible intelligence. Only the House and Senate intelligence oversight committees can get to the bottom of all this. But right now leading members of these committees, and the Speaker of the House, are blathering on -- and on -- about the phony issue of whether former Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the CIA to not testify about some program to wipe out the leaders of al Qaeda that never actually got off the ground.

This isn't politics; this is suicide. God help us if our enemies conclude that the United States is no longer capable of being serious about intelligence.

READ MORE


image toon gwot nsec = Oby's sand castles v Iran NKorea's rockets

Horrific “Honor”

It was as cold-blooded and vicious an honor crime as any the West has seen, but with one difference. This time, the victim was male.

A 24-year-old Asian man is clinging to life in a British hospital after seven men attacked him last week in London for having a friendship with a married Muslim woman.

The unidentified man, who is Muslim himself and has Danish citizenship, was stabbed twice in the back and beaten so severely with bricks that authorities report he is now blind in one eye and will probably lose sight in the other. Acid was also poured down the victim’s throat, damaging his tongue and throat so severely he will probably never speak again.

“The poor man got up and ran straight into a tree, then staggered back to his house, tugging at his burning clothes and banging on doors, shouting for water,” said one woman who witnessed the attack.

The victim’s body was also doused with acid, burning more than 50 per cent and leaving him in critical condition. News reports state he is not expected to survive. His assailants, police say, were all wearing gloves and masks for protection against the sulphuric acid, ... [ snip]

The motive for the attack, British newspapers report, is that the woman’s family, which is from Pakistan, considered the man’s friendship with her “insulting” to the family’s honor.

Incredibly, London police now expect the Pakistani family to attempt to further wash away more of that “foulness.” The woman, police fear, may be killed next and are trying to figure out how to protect her...

["Trying to figure it out" ? We take children from their parents for far less - why not here where there's no doubt?

Oops, forgot: don't' want to offend anyone.]


READ MORE

It wouldn't happen to the Koran

The Pope has condemned a ' disgusting' taxpayer-funded exhibition in which visitors are urged to deface the Bible.

Visitors were offered pens by gallery bosses so they could scrawl comments on the text - leading to a host of puerile and obscene remarks.

Pope Benedict XVI believes the stunt would not have been contemplated with a copy of the Koran.

Artist Anthony Schrag. He wanted gays and transsexuals who felt left out of religion

[Isn't that 'tolerant'.]

READ MORE

China has pointed questions for US in private

Washington - The United States and China are striking a conciliatory tone in their public comments during economic talks, although that hasn't stopped China from posing some pointed questions behind closed doors about such issues as America's soaring budget deficit to try to reassure China that the U.S. will not let deficits or inflation jeopardize the value of Chinese investments...

[Guess the days of the US asking China 'pointed questons' about its human rights violations are long gone. The consequences of becoming the world's super-debtor.

'Free' health care anyone?]


READ MORE


image toon - intl mny = IOU to China visible from space

Zelaya's Gone, but Democracy Now! Keeps Trying to Bring Him Back

.
... Let's take a moment to review some of the events that led to the Zelayas now finding themselves in their new role as perpetual guests of fellow Marxist President Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua:

  • 1. Officials are investigating allegations that Zelaya stole millions from the Central Bank of Honduras. A security video from the Central Bank of Honduras (now in the possession of the The Washington Times) shows Honduran officials entering the bank and withdrawing millions, which was taken directly to Mr. Zelaya’s chief of staff, Enrique Flores Lanza.
  • 2. Zelaya was planning an illegal referendum that, if successful, would have permitted him to serve a second term as president. This is blatantly illegal under the Honduran Constitution. Honduras’ Supreme Court, the military, its Congress, and the majority of the people were all united in their vigorous opposition to the referendum.
  • 3. The Zelaya administration was coming more and more under the influence of Marxist Hugo Chavez, the soon to be president-for-life of Venezuela. Honduras is a conservative country, and the growing influence of the leftist ideology of Chavez over Zelaya prompted Honduran Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga to declare that Zelaya no longer has:
“…any authority, moral or legal. The legal authority he lost because he broke laws and the moral authority he lost with a discourse full of lies. The most patriotic thing he could do is stay away. Anything else is just trying to impose Hugo Chavez’s project [Socialism] at all costs.”

The Hondurans don’t want Chavez-style authoritarianism, and running Zelaya out on a rail was their way of making that fact known to the world.

Goodman and the folks at Democracy Now! should begin to reconcile themselves to that fact.

READ MORE

FLASHBACKs >

Tossing Free Honduras under the Bus

Obama 'meddles' in Honduras -- and chooses the wrong side

Hondurans unhappy with Obama


.

Obama, Chavez Are Both Nationalizing Private Companies

Washington - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is taking over private companies in order to deal with the economic crisis that has affected both his country and the United States, and the Obama administration is trying to do roughly the same thing, Venezuelan political analyst Dr. Luis Vicente León told CNSNews.com Monday.

READ MORE


image toon intl sclm bbro = Oby drooling over Putin's control of everything

THE CENTER CANNOT HOLD

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has quickly come to an end. His policies are designed to radically re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not mitigate the recession.

The President's $3.6 trillion budget blueprint, by his own admission, redefines the role of government in our economy and society:

  • Almost triple the deficit.
  • Add $6.5 trillion to the national debt.
  • Leave future U.S. taxpayers (I.e., our children) with the tab.
Compared to the do-nothing option, Obama's deficit is more than 2.5 times larger in fiscal year 2013 - and that projection presumes that:

  • There will have been several years of economic recovery.
  • The funds will be returned from the financial bailouts.
  • U.S. forces will have withdrawn from Iraq.
Source: Michael J. Boskin, "The Center Cannot Hold," Hoover Institution, Summer 2009.

READ MORE

POLL: 62% Oppose Federal Bailouts for State Budget Problems

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 20% of adults favor bailing out financially troubled states. Nineteen percent (19%) are not sure which course is best.

These findings are largely unchanged from mid-May when California’s financial problems became national news.

Eighty-two percent (82%) of Republicans and 61% of adults not affiliated with either major political party oppose federal bailout help for states with budget problems.

A plurality (42%) of Democrats agree, but 31% think bailing out the states is a good idea.

Seventy-seven percent (77%) of voters nationwide say the unwillingness of politicians to cut government spending is a bigger problem than the public’s unwillingness to pay higher taxes.

Roughly seven-out-of-10 California voters oppose raising income and sales taxes to meet the state’s massive and growing budget deficit.

Forty-four percent (44%) of American adults say, generally speaking, the government tries to do too much, but 31% believe it doesn’t try to do enough...

READ MORE


image photo - c-art - mny reps - TREKONOMICS

A Chemical Scare Campaign Is Good Business for Some

Last month, the Statistical Assessment Service (STATS), a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization affiliated with George Mason University, released "Science Suppressed: How America became obsessed with BPA,

" a report which accuses the media of ignoring the extensive research of respected scientists and major health agencies in the United States and around the world, which found BPA was not only safe but played an important role in ensuring food safety." [snip]

If you're unfamiliar with Bisphenol A (BPA), it is a chemical used to make lightweight, versatile, durable, high-performance plastics. [like water bottles]

Until recently, this appeared to be nothing more than a typical attempt by liberals to go after business and manufacturing. But as several bloggers have recently pointed out, there appears to be a more sinister motive. You see, the radical environmental groups who fundraise off of this issue, the trial lawyers who line their pockets with class action lawsuits against BPA manufacturers, and the Democratic politicians who score political points by attacking BPA all have one thing in common: They all share the same PR huckster -- David Fenton.

If the name David Fenton of Fenton Communications sounds familiar, it may be because he's the guy who invented the 'General Betray Us' ad campaign that MoveOn.org used to attack General Petreaus... [snip]

Sadly, it appears that these attacks were not mistakes made with the best of intentions, but rather, a racket designed to put money in the pockets of liberal special interests...

READ MORE

What Green Jobs?

President Obama devoted nearly $60 billion of his stimulus package to building a new green-based economy rich in renewable energy and strategies to cut carbon.

But despite the price tag, not one green job yet exists.

It comes down to a problem of etymology. No one can yet agree on what a green job actually is...

[Guess it's now called the 'sixty billion dollar question'. Too bad no one had time to read the thing before they passed it.]

READ MORE

72% Don’t Want Feds Changing Their Light Bulbs

Just 18% of adults think it’s the government’s job to tell Americans what kind of light bulb they use, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Seventy-two percent (72%) say it’s none of the government’s business, and 10% are not sure.

The federal government under an energy bill passed in 2007 is requiring consumers to dump incandescent bulbs, the ones we’ve used for well over a century, for more expensive fluorescent ones. The plan is scheduled to go into effect over the next 10 years in the name of great energy efficiency.

Eighty-three percent (83%) of Republicans and 78% of adults not affiliated with either major political party say it’s not the government’s role to make Americans change their light bulbs. Among Democrats, 58% share that view, but 29% say it is the government’s job.



READ MORE

Democrats search for villains on health care

.
With their health care plans in a holding pattern — and no George W. Bush to kick around anymore — Democrats are casting about for somebody to blame.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn says that Republicans have “perfected ‘just say no.’”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said insurance companies are chalking up “immoral profits.”

But even if they won’t acknowledge it publicly, most Democrats in Congress know the truth: It’s their own colleagues who are slowing down progress in both the House and the Senate...

[Again and again: they don't debate the merits of their ideas but attack anyone who questions...]

READ MORE

White House using class warfare to sell health reform plan

In explaining why it was OK to sock a new 5.4% tax on the highest earners in this country — to pay for health care reform — President Obama’s press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said this:

“The president believes that the richest 1% of this country has had a pretty good run of it for many years.”

Ah. So that’s it. The old “You’ve had it good enough for long enough” policy...

[What has our country come to that a politician at any level can say such a thing and not be thrown out of office?]

READ MORE

Plastic Surgery Tax Eyed As Revenue Raiser

Face-lifts, tummy tucks and hair transplants could be hit with a new tax to help finance the trillion-dollar healthcare overhaul plan, according to sources familiar with the Senate talks.

The Senate Finance Committee has discussed imposing a 10 percent excise tax on cosmetic surgery deemed 'unnecessary' [by whom?] for medical purposes.

[Translation: how dare you pay for for just your own surgery - if you can afford that you should be made to pay for someone else's.

'Home of the free.']


READ MORE


image toon - hcare = My health - your obligation

Rare, Truthful Treat: AP's 'Fact Check' On Obama Presser Hits Surprisingly Hard

.
Associated Press's Calvin Woodward does the primary honors in an AP Fact Check that takes aim at the President's 'accuracy' in his descriptions of his health care bill... [snip]

OBAMA: "It will keep government out of health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your insurance if you're happy with it."

THE FACTS: A commission appointed by the government would determine what is and isn't covered by insurance plans offered in a new purchasing pool, including a plan sponsored by the government. The bill also holds out the possibility that, over time, those standards could be imposed on all private insurance plans, not just the ones in the pool.

OBAMA: "I have also pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our deficit over the next decade, and I mean it."

THE FACTS: White House Budget Director Peter Orszag told reporters this week that the promise 'does not apply' to proposed spending of about $245 billion over the next decade to increase fees for doctors serving Medicare patients.

OBAMA: "You haven't seen me out there blaming the Republicans."

THE FACTS: Obama did so in his opening statement, saying, "I've heard that one Republican strategist told his party that even though they may want to compromise, it's better politics to 'go for the kill."

OBAMA: "If we had done nothing ... you'd have a $9.3 trillion deficit over the next 10 years. Because of the changes we've made, it's going to be $7.1 trillion."

THE FACTS: Obama's numbers are based on figures compiled by his own 'budget office'. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, in its own analysis of the president's budget numbers, concluded that the cumulative deficit over the next decade would be $9.1 trillion.

Woodward et al could have done a bit better. Their "deficit-neutral" fact check point ignored Congressional Budget Office predictions that the legislation will add to the deficit, and to spending.

The AP team could have further pointed to the history of federal programs in general, which rarely if ever stay within their anticipated spending constraints, or to Massachusetts's government-run Commonwealth Care, supposedly a model for much of what is in ObamaCare, where costs are spiraling out of control.

Nonetheless, Woodward and ABC's Jake Tapper remain virtually alone in the White House press corps in their willingness to report negative news about Obama or to even question him on identified analysis items.

Will that ever change?

READ MORE

WaPo Shocker: President Is Hiding Cost of Obamacare

.
What was a terrible week for Barack Obama likely worsened Sunday when the Washington Post editorial board accused the President of withholding from the public the true costs of the healthcare reform he so eagerly seeks.

With as much as Obama has on the line with this agenda item, these words from the Post have to hurt ...

READ MORE


image toon - hcare = Oby's nose grows re plan saving money

Hawaii officials confirm Obama's original birth certificate still exists

Hawai'i's Health Department confirmed yesterday that it has President Obama's original Aug. 4, 1961, birth certificate in storage, but the announcement is unlikely to satisfy conspiracy theorists who insist Obama was born in Kenya.

'We don't destroy vital records,; Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo said. ;'That's our whole job, to maintain and retain vital records.'

[Terrific, produce it, and put the whole topic to rest.]

READ MORE

Traffic to Obama's White House Web Site Has Plummeted

.
The traffic at President Obama's official White House Web site--whitehouse.gov--has fallen from a post-Inauguration peak to nearly the same level it was during the waning days of the Bush administration

The dramatic drop in traffic has happened despite the Obama Administration's complete redesign of the site. Traffic to the site has fallen 51.6 percent in the last three months.

People are also spending less time on the site than they did before.

READ MORE


image toon - 1st fnn msm bias reps libs - Super-Oby believed what press said about him

Obamas' dog Bo celebrates his 'first 100 days'

.

Los Angeles Times

[Our professional media - and no, you're not getting a link]
.

Sarah of Liberty

Sarah Palin may become the great champion of liberty in an era when it is under threat as never before. Two pictures contained herein in this express this hope.



Sarah Palin has already demonstrated a capacity to connect with ordinary Americans. This charisma frightens and angers many and the left, and not a few Republicans as well.

The phony intellectual elitists, who have little or no understanding, much less grounding, in the fundamental ideas undergirding the American republic, as well as the shallow conservative intellectuals, jealous of her connection to the taproot of the American spirit, will no doubt be bewildered by her reappearence on the national stage.

But the American people, who don't think you must be stupid if you didn't go to an Ivy League university, and who understand that America is a special nation, a unique experiment in liberty, will respond. American exceptionalism is as much an anathema to the pointy heads as shopping at Wal-Mart. But not to mainstream America.

I have a strong suspicion that Sarah Palin will emerge as a strong champion of liberty.




READ MORE

Peggy Noonan: Sarah Palin Jealous

You're Peggy Noonan and you're jealous. But it's not the normal kind of jealous, the kind reserved for girlfriends who can squeeze into size 2 jeans. No, it's the kind of jealous that hurts, that grabs your gut and twists, that has you howling with rage into your pillow in the middle of the night, screaming "It's not fair" like a two-year-old denied another piece of cake. It is Sarah Palin jealous...and it is consuming you... [snip]

They talk about the Palin family fishing business-big deal. Anyone can get a couple of fish -- just call Leonards' on Third Avenue and they will deliver. But Palin is not the only savvy executive type. You got together with your closest friends, all the kind of women who, unlike Sarah Palin, live in the real world where women wear "Channel jackets" and "long, flowing pants with heels," and understand life, as Reuters noted, "on a level that goes beyond the mundane."

You're Peggy Noonan and you're jealous. Your "beyond the mundane" co-founders -- "buds" as the Sarah Palin types so crassly put it-for your new venture are the essence of your kind of middle America: they include "60 Minutes" reporter Lesley Stahl; actresses Candice Bergen, Whoopi Goldberg and Marlo Thomas, your type of conservatives, which puts them a bit to the right of Hugo Chavez... [snip]

But after a year your audience is less than 20 percent of what is defined as success, your investors are worried, and the same women who pack Sarah Palin rallies are ignoring your venture, which features such pieces as "Michelle Obama's Scintillating Style" and "French Fashion Designers Churn Out Stylish Burqhas."

What is wrong with this country? Why don't people listen to you? Can't they read without moving their lips?

You're Peggy Noonan and you're jealous. And, worst of all, Sarah Palin is not...

[More, Recommended > ]

READ MORE

Great polling data for Sarah Palin

So where does Sarah Palin stand right now? Well according to the recent Public Policy Poll (PPP) she is doing quite well, in fact she is in the lead of all potential GOP 2012 contenders.

Sarah Palin favorability rating among conservative Republicans is 73%, Huckabee is at 65%, and Romney is at 53%. Sarah Palin also has a 45% approval rating among registered independents, which is just under half of their support. Sarah Palin also scored huge among Hispanic voters with a 51% approval rating, with not even a close second among GOP 2012 hopefuls. Sarah Palin also leads among GOP 2012 contenders with the 18-29 age range with 51% having a favorability rating in what is traditionally considered a Democratic stronghold.

In every region in the country Sarah Palin is in the lead against all the other GOP 2012 hopefuls; with 43% in the Northeast, 47% in the South, 50% in the Midwest, and 51% in the West.

How about among GOP “moderates” surely Sarah Palin is not doing well with this demographic, right? Wrong the PPP Poll finds that,

“For the second month in a row we found Sarah Palin as the most popular of the leading 2012 GOP hopefuls among moderate Republicans. 64% have a positive opinion of her compared to 57% for Newt Gingrich, 53% for Mike Huckabee, and 45% for Mitt Romney.”

So for Sarah Palin the sky is the limit, and she has yet to really start taking the fight to the Democrats and Obama.

READ MORE

An Incoherent Truth
NY Times, by Paul Krugman


"Right now the fate of health care reform seems to rest in the hands of relatively conservative Democrats — mainly members of the Blue Dog Coalition, created in 1995. And you might be tempted to say that President Obama needs to give those Democrats what they want.

But he can’t — because the Blue Dogs aren’t making sense..."

[Krugman saying someone else isn't making sense - now that's comical.
{points for the title though}]


READ MORE


image toon - 1st fnn hcare = Blue dog pees on Obycare signpost
- 090729 end -
.




What if Palin Were President?

Can you believe the gall of these Sarah Palin cultists? Presidential aspirations? This is a woman who named one of her kids "Track," for God's sake. (Well, if it really is her kid.)

William Buckley once wrote that he rather would

"entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University."

But running government is no longer a suitable vocation for the bumbling proletariat. It's for folks with schoolin' and such. It's a job for herculean thinkers with degrees from Ivy League schools. In other words, no one from Alaska need apply.

Former sports reporters certainly won't do. We need former constitutional scholars. Who else, after all, has a better understanding of how to undermine the document?

Really, where would we be if a bumpkin like Palin were president? With her brainpower, we probably would be stuck with a Cabinet full of tax cheats, retreads and moralizing social engineers.

If Palin were president, chances are we'd have a gaffe-generating motormouth for a vice president. That's the kind of decision-making one expects from Miss Congeniality.

The job of building generational debt is not for the unsophisticated. Enriching political donors with taxpayer dollars takes intellectual prowess, not the skills of a moose-hunting point guard.

The talent to print money we don't have to pay for programs we can't afford is the work of a finely tuned imagination, soaring gravitas and endless policy know-how.

Palin is so clueless she probably would have rushed through some colossal stimulus plan that ended up stimulating nothing.

If Palin were president, no one doubts this nation would have continued the Bush-era policy of indefinite detention of enemy combatants and the CIA's program of transferring prisoners to other countries without legal rights. Be thankful you have a president who makes you think this nation doesn't.

If Palin were commander in chief -- and, again, can anyone imagine anything so preposterous? -- the United States still would be fighting endless and expensive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It's true that Palin's first veto as Alaska governor was of a bill that would have blocked state employee benefits and health insurance for same-sex couples, but does anyone doubt her true intentions?

If she were president, brave American soldiers still would be living under the dark specter of "don't ask, don't tell." Palin even might have instructed her Justice Department to file a brief in defense of the Defense of Marriage Act. Such is the depth of her depravity.

Does anyone believe that Palin possesses the competence to nationalize entire industries without the consent of the people? A housewife from Wasilla isn't equipped with political brawn to shake down banks and bondholders.

Palin never would be able to convince Americans that a trillion-dollar government-run health care plan would save taxpayers money or have the rhetorical ability to convince even a single person that a European-style cap-and-trade scheme has any benefit at all.

Palin is such a goofball that she probably believes oil will continue to be a vital American energy source.

And how is anyone as simplistic as Palin going to help change the habits of all these fatsos in America? We need a mommy ... but, you know, not a real mommy.

For Palin, though, there is hope.

Just because you're the target of a revolting elitist hit job doesn't mean you're ready to be president. I don't believe Palin has thought deeply enough about serious issues. She certainly has proved to be unable to defend herself adequately on intellectual grounds.

To this point, at least, Palin hasn't offered much more than populist sloganeering. Her popularity often seems fueled by charisma alone.

So, judging from Barack Obama's 'success', she has all the makings of a future president.

READ MORE

Tuesday, July 28, 2009


image toon = vals reps libs - Rev Wright teaching Oby values bdd

Impersonating a Victim

This past March 29th, Professor Henry Louis Gates was being interviewed in front of a small group by Walter Isaacson on C-SPAN's Book TV. Thirty-three minutes into the discussion about his new book on Lincoln, Professor Gates began a detailed account of his own genealogy. He said that in doing so he had discovered he was about "50% white". He said that this was quote, "To my astonishment and horror...".

He continued by saying that he had subsequently sent his DNA off to be tested. This time, upon finding out he was "57% white", he said again, "to my horror .... I was becoming more white by the minute". To this Gates, Isaacson and everyone else there chuckled.

Something tells me that if Mr. Isaacson had said that he also had sent his DNA off and found that to his "astonishment and horror" he was 57% black, no one would chuckle, least of all the Professor of African American Studies at Harvard, Dr. Gates... [snip]

Gates must believe using such colloquialisms as "yo' mama" gives him some sort of black victimhood authenticity. What a fool. In reality, he is a member of the American aristocratic class. As a victim, he is an imposter.

READ MORE


image toon - 1st vals bdd = Rev Wright's teaching come home to rooste with Oby

MSNBC Chief: You're might be a racist if...

If you have ever harbored doubt about why the Obama machine has been unable to provide incontrovertible proof of his U.S. citizenship, then you ... are ... a ... racist.

Sure, it sounds funny enough to be a Jeff Foxworthy punch line, but it was said in utter, condescending sincerity.

In what could be a new low in hypocrisy -- even for the home of Chris "I Felt a Thrill Going Up My Leg" Matthews and that former sportscaster in the evening -- the president of MSNBC, Phil Griffin, called anyone who has concerns about Barack Obama's citizenship, "racist."

Griffin's comments came after the national media finally paid a little attention -- albeit belatedly, and mostly mockingly -- last week to the ongoing controversy over Barack Obama's eligibility to be President. Once again, new media dragged the dinosaurs into a story they wouldn't otherwise have covered.

After a YouTube video of Delaware Congressman Mike Castle being heckled at a town hall about Obama's citizenship went viral, the AP reported that the question became one of the most popular topics at its Ask AP column.

Lou Dobbs, on both his radio show and on CNN, and MSNBC and its partner in slime, NBC, also spent time on the questions about Obama's citizenship status.

The tone of the two entities affiliated with GE -- which plans to make out like a robber baron from Obama's policies -- was predictable.

"It's racist. It's racist. Just call it for what it is."

But the response from NBC was far different when leftists leveled similar charges against John McCain during last year's campaign... [snip]

So, when the citizenship of a genuine American hero, who has been in the public eye for over three decades, is questioned by liberal bloggers, the Obamatons at NBC treat the matter seriously.

Whereas, when similar charges are raised against a relatively unknown product of Chicago's dirty political swamp, who has close ties to convicted felons, domestic terrorists, and an organization repeatedly accused of using taxpayer money to perpetrate widespread voter fraud, who is connected to shady land dealings, and whose long-time 'spiritual advisor' blames America for 9/11 and has called on God to "damn America", those who would even consider questions about the rather unsettled proof of Obama's citizenship are called racists.

Is there any way to doubt Barack Obama without being called a racist?

"The Place for Politics"? More like, The Place for Propaganda.

READ MORE

Gibbs: Nothing will satisfy the birthers

There's nothing the White House can say that will quell the questions about Obama's birth certificate, press secretary Robert Gibbs said today. "The God's honest truth is no," Gibbs said when asked if the White House would ever be able to satisfy the so-called birthers...

[Actually, I believe a birth certificate would do the trick. The real questions should be; why not supply it and put the whole topic to rest, especially as it's supposedly a constitutional requirement to hold the office?]

READ MORE


image toon - 1st vals fnn = Racist for asking Gates-Oby for ID's

Nigeria 'unrest'


Maiduguri, Nigeria - Muslim rebels on Monday expanded their attack against Nigerian security forces to three northern states with at least 80 people dead in two days of clashes, security sources said.

Gun battles between police and members of a local Islamic group, which wants a wider adoption of Islamic law across Nigeria, were reported in Yobe, Kano and Borno states...

[G.W.O.T.]

READ MORE

U.S. student gets tougher sentence for plot to kill Bush


An American Muslim student found guilty of belonging to al-Qaeda and plotting to kill former U.S. president George W. Bush has been sentenced to life imprisonment, a tougher penalty than what he received in 2006.

Ahmed Omar Abu Ali had been sentenced to 30 years in prison following his conviction, but the appeals court ruled that he should be sentenced again because the punishment was too lenient...

[G.W.O.T.]

READ MORE

Anti-terror agents arrest 6 in North Carolina


A North Carolina man and six others have been charged with conspiring to support terrorism by training and traveling overseas to participate in "violent jihad."

Daniel Boyd and half-dozen of his alleged recruits in the Raleigh, N.C. area were charged with providing material support to terrorism...

[G.W.O.T.]

READ MORE

L.A.Times Still Calling it the ‘So-Called War on Terror’

.
In the L.A. Times on July 22, writer Catherine Lyons again revealed a bit of her Bush Derangement Syndrome by calling the war on terror a “so-called war on terror.”

What is with these people that simply cannot accept terms of reality?

It’s like this every time they use the word terrorism, or terrorism as the Old Media so often terms it, and the war on terror. The Old Media simply refuses to understand that terrorism exists, that it is a problem, and that we are at war with terrorists.

READ MORE


image toon - 1st lbrty gwot msm bias tea - T stands for terrorists

Muslims welcome police scarf move

.
Avon and Somerset Police is issuing head coverings to its female officers so they can [?] enter mosques. The force says the move will help its officers respect Muslim religious customs while carrying out their job.

The garments, designed to match the force's uniform, were designed in consultation with Muslim groups...

READ MORE


.

GOP rep criticizes UAW for refusing to testify at auto oversight hearing

.
The lone member of Congress on the panel chastised UAW chief Ron Gettelfinger for ignoring the panel's invitation to testify, saying they had no difficulty getting to Washington when they needed money.

"Now that it's time to account for the money, we don't see them,"

Hensarling expressed concern that the decision to put the interests of the union-run retiree health care trust funds ahead of those companies' secured lenders could have "chilling and far-reaching consequences" for commercial lending...

[Union before country.]

READ MORE

46% More Likely To Buy Ford ‘Cause It Didn’t Get A Bailout

Public opposition to the auto bailouts may translating into consumer buying decisions, with 46% of Americans now saying they are more likely to buy a car from Ford because it did not take government money to stay in business.

Most Americans (53%) continue to believe that it is at least somewhat likely that the government, now that it has substantial ownership stakes in GM and Chrysler, will pass laws and regulations giving those two automakers an unfair advantage over Ford. Thirty percent (30%) say it’s very likely.

Forty-one percent (41%) of Americans expect the quality of GM cars to get worse now that the federal government is the company’s majority owner. Just 19% believe the quality of GM cars will improve.

READ MORE


image toon - sclm auto = GM v Ford pickup demolition derby

THE EXPANDING FED ROLE

The Federal Reserve (the U.S. central bank) is becoming less competent as the number of its functions increases, says Richard W. Rahn, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and chairman of the Institute for Global Economic Growth.

The Fed suffers from conflicting responsibilities both within the organization and with other government agencies and actions:

  • It is charged with maintaining full employment, but the long-run level of employment depends far more on government fiscal policy (tax rates, government spending and regulatory burdens) than on monetary policy.
  • During the great inflation of the late 1970s, the money supply as measured by M1 (currency and checking accounts) grew by almost a record 40 percent in four years, and yet in the past year alone M1, has grown by almost 20 percent.
The reason inflation is stable despite the rapid monetary growth is that velocity -- the number of times a dollar is spent in a year -- has been falling. People have been hoarding cash rather than buying new homes or autos.

Once excess inventories are worked off and global commodity prices begin to rise again, inflation fears will come back quickly and people will rush to get rid of their dollars by buying "stuff." Unless the Fed can quickly extinguish all of the new money it has created, inflation will come roaring back.

The Fed needs to be split up, the Fed's bank regulatory functions need to be put into a separate agency and the new central bank should not be required to buy government debt.

The smarter folks in Washington understand that the trillions of dollars of new spending will be "paid for" largely by the "inflation tax," which will fall hardest on those without assets -- i.e. the poor.

READ MORE


Politics of Climate Science: Selective Research, Ignored Facts

.
Marston Bates said, Research is the process of going up alleys to see if they are blind. But what happens if a research alley is avoided or ignored? Often the answer is in what is ignored, not what is presented. It’s an unacceptable practice in science and only indicates the political nature of the climate change research and debate.

Why is the Most Important Greenhouse Gas Ignored?

We should change the name of the planet from Earth to Water. It covers much more of the surface than land and is unique from the other planets. All the emphasis is on temperature, but what happens to precipitation is far more important for plants and agriculture. Precipitation is mentioned in claims of increased droughts with global warming, but it’s a scare tactic and illogical. Warmer temperatures mean more moisture in the air with more precipitation potential, not less. The illogic eludes notice because of lack of understanding of the role of water in atmospheric processes

Generally the public is unaware water vapor is 95% of the greenhouse gases by volume and CO2 is less than 4%, yet water vapor is virtually ignored. [Ah, but that's because SUVs don't 'emit' water vapor - so it must be the CO2] Here is a web site devoted to greenhouse gases (GHG) but water vapor, by far the most abundant and important one is listed under “other.” [snip]

A Positive Feedback that is Actually Negative

There’s a problem even if you accept the assumption an increase in CO2 will cause a temperature increase. The atmosphere is almost saturated with respect to CO2’s capacity to delay heat escape. A good analogy is the objective of blocking light coming through a window. A single coat of paint will block almost all the light and is like the current level of CO2 in the atmosphere. Second and third coats block very little more light just as doubling or tripling CO2 will cause very little temperature increase.

“What we see, then, is that the very foundation of the issue of global warming is wrong.” ... “In a normal field, these results would pretty much wrap things up, but global warming/climate change has developed so much momentum that it has a life of its own – quite removed from science."

Now the world is in a blind alley with energy and economic policies based on predictions from climate models that omit major elements and use false assumptions...

READ MORE

WAXMAN-MARKEY BILL WOULD RAISE ELECTRICITY PRICES $846 BILLION

The bill has been approved by the U.S. House of Representatives and is pending action in the Senate.

The CBO findings support statements, by both critics and supporters of the bill, noting consumers will pay higher energy prices if carbon dioxide restrictions are imposed on the American public:

  • Government likes cap-and-trade because it is a hidden, or indirect, tax for which industry, rather than Congress or the president, will get the blame when energy prices rise.
  • The public gets smacked twice -- once by higher food and fuel prices and a second time by having to pay for those unemployed by the bill.
  • In addition, the increased unemployment benefits will require cuts to other programs, higher taxes, or bigger deficits.
Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah), chairman of the congressional Western Caucus, says Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is not truly concerned about the effects of the bill on energy prices or jobs.

"Right now, many Americans are making the responsible decision to cut back on expenses and tighten their belts in order to weather these challenging economic times. Yet Democrats in Congress refuse to adopt that same type of fiscal restraint. Instead, they remain more steadfast than ever in their commitment to excessive spending habits -- habits bankrolled by the hardworking American taxpayer."

"Cap-and-trade captures the very essence of the Democrat tax-and-spend model that continues to wage war on the American pocketbook. This national energy tax will discourage job creation, drive up energy costs, derail energy independence, and diminish domestic supply.

And yet, there is no sound scientific evidence that proves these policies will bring about effective and measurable change other than job loss and increased costs."

Source: H. Sterling Burnett, "Waxman-Markey Bill Would Raise Electricity Prices $846 Billion," Heartland Institute, August 2009.

READ MORE


image toon - grn engry = C&T already worknig - it's cold


"OPPOSE WAXMAN-MARKEY CAP & TAX "


Senate-Reid: http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
YOUR Senator: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

or: Speed Message them with your personal distribution list...
and as always, pass it on...
contact-template

POLL: Most Arizona Voters Put Immigration Over Health Care as More Important Reform Goal

Fifty-one percent (51%) of Arizona voters say it is more important for Congress to pass immigration reform than health care reform. A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in the state shows that 45% hold the opposite view and think health care reform is more important.

By a 65% to 20% margin, Arizona voters believe enforcing the borders is more important than legalizing the status of those already living here. Half of the state’s voters (50%) think it is possible to put an end to illegal immigration, while 34% do not. [not if you don't try]

Voters in the Grand Canyon State highly regard Maricopa Country Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, known for his tough immigration enforcement. Fifty-seven percent (57%) say the sheriff’s policies have helped the state’s image, showing little change from May. Twenty-seven percent (27%) say the sheriff’s policies hurt the state’s image. [?]

READ MORE


FLASHBACKs >

Monday, May 18, 2009
Al Sharpton vs. Sheriff Joe: The Hypocrite vs. The Patriot
"Arpaio needs to be confronted, he needs to be removed. ... We also need to suspend the law that he is using. We must stand with our brown brothers and sisters," Sharpton said.

Monday, March 16, 2009
Harassing A Lawman
... the Justice Department notified Joe Arpaio, the top lawman in Maricopa County, Ariz., including Phoenix, that his department is under investigation for "patterns of discriminatory" police practices...

The letter offered zero specifics.


Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Hispanic Leaders Fear Patrols Will Spark Violence
By whom?
.

California threatened with loss of funds if it doesn't use test scores in evaluating teachers

California could lose out on millions of federal education dollars unless legislators change a law that prevents it from using student test scores to measure teachers' performance, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan is expected to announce in a speech today.

California has among the worst records of any state in collecting and using data to evaluate teachers and schools...

READ MORE