Thursday, December 11, 2008

THE TRUE COSTS OF EPA GLOBAL WARMING REGULATION

... the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), pursuant to a 2007 Supreme Court decision ['finding' CO2 to be a polutant {?!?}], has initiated steps toward bypassing the legislative process and regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act ...

The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) is nothing less than the most costly, complicated, and unworkable regulatory scheme ever proposed:

• Under ANPR, nearly every product, business, and building that uses fossil fuels could face requirements that border on the impossible.

The overall cost of this agenda would likely reach well into the trillions of dollars while destroying millions of jobs in the manufacturing sector.
Furthermore, the impact of ANPR on the overall economy, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP), would be substantial:

• Job losses are expected to exceed 800,000 in some years, and exceed at least 500,000 from 2015 through 2026 (note that these are net job losses, after any jobs created by compliance with the regulations--so-called green jobs--are taken into account.)

• The job losses or shifts to lower paying jobs are substantial, leading to declines in disposable income of $145 billion by 2015 -- more than $1,000 per household.
The ANPR is clearly not in the best interests of Americans, and the EPA should not proceed to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and final rule based upon it.

READ MORE

[then:

"Oppose EPA's Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Re: Regulation of CO2 as a polutant"

US President mailto:president@whitehouse.gov
Obama transition http://www.change.gov/page/s/contact
Your Congressman https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
Your Senator http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm


and as always, pass it on...]

No comments: