CAP-AND-TRADE IN THE WEST

[Separate from Obama's Washington efforts]

Reviewing the three cap-and-trade recommendations made by the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), the authors identified several flaws made by the seven-state consortium, consisting of Arizona, California, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah and Washington. Thus, calling into question the so-called cost savings of $11.4 billion to $23.5 billion heralded by WCI.

Under a scenario in which 25 percent of greenhouse gas emission permits would be auctioned off to emitters in a cap-and-trade scheme, BHI determined that the seven states:

• Would lose between 35,177 to 165,397 private sector jobs, while the permit revenue would allow the states to hire up to 19,710 state employees.
• Would put investment by firms at serious risk by slowing investment in the region by $1.6 billion to $4.5 billion.
• Would diminish total personal income, which would fall by $10.2 billion to $47.71 billion per year.

Moreover, BHI found that none of the 7 WCI states would escape economic harm should cap-and-trade be imposed.

The proposals' negative economic effects stem from the price and tax increases the states would impose on the energy and transportation sectors.

Because a cap on carbon emissions is effectively a tax on energy production that is passed to industry, businesses and consumers, the effect is likely to drive commerce and jobs to other states or countries...

READ MORE

image toon - grn engry = new green power jolts the wallet