When Barack Obama, the US presidential candidate, stood up to deliver his speech at the Democratic convention in Denver, he was never likely to dwell long on foreign policy before an audience concerned mostly about domestic economic problems.
Even so, he gave short shrift to the crisis in Georgia, a measure of America’s startlingly relaxed response to Russian aggression. In his 44-minute address, Obama devoted just two sentences to the Russian threat, with a bland promise of “tough, direct diplomacy . . . that can curb Russian aggression”.
The candidate’s swift dismissal of what may prove the next US president’s most difficult foreign policy challenge confirmed a curious effect of the Russian invasion of Georgia. Despite warnings from numerous US officials that Moscow’s actions represent a serious long-term threat to the West, neither the US media nor most of the American public have shown the remotest interest in the turmoil in the Caucasus.
Indeed there was a widely expressed belief that this was a crisis that Europe ought to be able to handle. But the prospects for an agreement among 27 countries on anything, let alone sanctions against Russia, are not good.
The key to their timidity is energy security...
READ MORE
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Where’s next in Vladimir Putin’s sights?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment