Sunday, August 2, 2009

Safe-Sender note safe sender

Pictures not downloading in Email? Allow images by adding us to your
Safe Sender List, or view it in your Browser.

For those truly 'time challenged', try Red Reading for just-the-gist points.

Thursday, July 30, 2009


GOP BILL PROMOTES CITIZEN CONTROL


Members of the Republican Study Committee are putting forward their own piece of legislation for health care reform, a summary of which was provided exclusively to CBSNews.com's Washington Unplugged.

While Democrats are focusing on creating something like a government-sponsored health insurance plan and regulating the health insurance market, the Republican


"Empowering Patients First Act,"

which Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) will introduce tomorrow, instead promotes the individual insurance market as well as employer-based markets. Instead of focusing on regulating private insurers, the plan would in fact give them more freedom to work across state lines. Republicans say the plan will be paid for by reforms of defensive medicine, creating a more efficient health care system, and overall reductions in non-defense government spending.

"Liability reform has to be one or the hallmarks of a bill," ... "We make certain we pay for our bill by making this a priority."

Expanding Coverage in Employer-Based and Individual Markets

According to the summary, the bill aims to make health care accessible to all Americans by creating tax incentives for consumers to purchase insurance on the individual market, encouraging states to assist consumers with pre-existing conditions, and promoting the employer-based insurance system that is popular with many Americans.

"It's imperative each and every American have the access to health coverage that they select," ... "The way you do that is through the tax code to make it financially feasible."

The Republican proposal would extend the income tax deduction on health care premiums to those who purchase coverage in the individual market. By contrast, several others -- ranging from Republican Sen. John McCain to Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden-- have proposed eliminating the deductions all together; that idea, however, has remained unpopular.

In the Republican plan, low-income consumers would also be eligible for advanceable, refundable tax credits, provided on a sliding scale, to purchase coverage in the individual market.

In order to provide coverage for Americans who have pre-existing conditions, the Republican plan proposes giving states incentives, such as federal block grants, to establish high-risk insurance pools. Comparatively, Democrats have proposed regulating insurance companies to prohibit them from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.

To promote the employer-based health insurance system, the Republican plan proposes giving small businesses tax incentives for auto-enrolling employees in a plan. Many companies already auto-enroll their employees. The plan also calls for allowing workers to define their own contributions to an employer-sponsored plan. Employers would als be encouraged to offer discounts for healthy habits through wellness and prevention programs

Republicans are also proposing to expand the individual market by creating pooling mechanisms such as association health plans and individual membership accounts. Consumers would also be able to shop for insurance across state lines. They would be able to obtain more information about different plans through state-based health plan portals the Republican plan proposes creating.


Medicaid and Medicare

The Republican plan also proposes reforming Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) by giving beneficiaries the option of getting a voucher to purchase private insurance. Mr. Obama, in fact, wants to lessen encouragement for private insurer participation in government-run programs like Medicaid and Medicare -- he has proposed eliminating subsidies for private insurers to participate in Medicare Advantage.

The Republican plan also reforms Medicaid by dictating that states must cover 90 percent of those below 200 percent of the federal poverty level before they can expand eligibility levels under Medicaid and SCHIP.

Republicans and Democrats agree the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), a formula Congress created to keep Medicare costs under control, needs to be reformed. Without reform, doctors could face a pay cut in Medicare reimbursements of about 20 percent. The Republican plan would rebase the SGR and create two separate conversion factors for primary care and all other services.


Cost Containment

Republican and Democratic ideas about health care reform perhaps differ most substantially on the issue of cost containment. Most of the reforms proposed in the bill, the summary says, would be paid for by decreasing defensive medicine [aka, tort reform]; savings from health care efficiencies; reducing waste, fraud and abuse; and an annual one-percent non-defense discretionary spending step down.

The plan touches on Mr. Obama's proposal to further implement comparative effectiveness research (CER) as a means of reducing waste, which is very controversial. CER attempts to use research and scientific evidence to conclude which health care treatments are most cost effective. The president already instituted the idea through the the stimulus package, which created the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research to coordinate CER across the federal government.

The Republican health care proposal would require that none of the suggestions from the Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research be finalized unless done in consultation with and approved by medical specialty societies. It would also establish performance-based quality measures endorsed by the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) and physician specialty organizations.

The Republican plan also addresses the issue of medical liabilities that doctors face -- something Democrats have not addressed. It would establish in each state administrative health care tribunals, also known as health courts, and add affirmative defense through provider established best practice measures. It would encourage the speedy resolution of claims and caps non-economic damages.

Price said today on Washington Unplugged that the August recess will give Americans the chance to compare and contrast Republican and Democratic plans.

"If we go home over August and talk to the patients of America, we wil have a better product in the fall," ..."The American people will select solutions that will put them in charge, not the government."

READ MORE

[But it must make a 'buzz' when introduced - so it's important we contact our representatives today ...


"SUPPORT 'EMPOWERING PATIENTS FIRST ACT"


House-Pelosi: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
YOUR Congressman: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

or: Speed Message them with your personal distribution list...

and as always, pass it on... [select to forward this Brief by email].

.

[not yet]
.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009


image toon - 1st fnn vals = Oby snares change-balloon on Gates wires

Devolution: AP Waters Down Obama-Gates-Crowley

Watching Associated Press reports evolve, or as is all too often the case, devolve, can be a revealing exercise.

Example: What happened between 8 p.m. Friday and 8 a.m. Saturday that would have caused the Associated Press and writer Nancy Benac to water down the headline and opening paragraphs of their story about the Obama-Gates-Crowley situation from this ....



.... to this?



Why, 12 hours later, when there are no known developments in the story, is the situation no longer one that Obama "helped fire" or "stoke"?

While the AP headline writers and Benac eased up on Obama, Benac didn't lighten up on Obama critics, as the following paragraphs from each report demonstrate... [snip]

The current AP dynamic link is here, so readers can see if and/or how Benac's story further devolves.

READ MORE


image toon - 1st fnn vals reps libs = Acted Stupidly so scaping OBY sticker off car

Did the CIA 'Cook the Books' on Iran?

.
Thanks to a brilliant piece of journalism by German investigative reporter Bruno Schirra published in the July 20 edition of The Wall Street Journal Europe, we have evidence to suggest that the 2007 NIE's conclusion about Iran's nuclear bomb program [having been halted] wasn't merely wrong, but corrupt.

Simply put, while our country's intelligence service believed that Iran had abandoned its nuclear bomb program in 2003, Germany's intelligence service was amassing evidence that the Iranian bomb program was ongoing. This raises three obvious and crucially important questions:

  • Was our country's intelligence service aware of the BND's evidence and conclusions when its analysts wrote that 2007 NIE about Iran?
  • If not, why not?
  • If our intelligence service was aware of the BND's evidence and conclusions, then how and why did the authors of that 2007 NIE reach the opposite conclusion about Iran's nuclear bomb program?
It is inconceivable to me that senior officials of our intelligence service were unaware of the BND's evidence and conclusions about Iran's nuclear bomb program. On the other hand, if our intelligence officials were aware of the BND's evidence and conclusions, why did we reach the opposite conclusion?

Did they just ignore the BND's evidence because they didn't like it and because our intelligence officials wanted to throw a banana peel under President Bush's feet?

A nuclear-armed Iran threatens our national survival, and that to meet this threat President Obama and his advisers need the best possible intelligence. Only the House and Senate intelligence oversight committees can get to the bottom of all this. But right now leading members of these committees, and the Speaker of the House, are blathering on -- and on -- about the phony issue of whether former Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the CIA to not testify about some program to wipe out the leaders of al Qaeda that never actually got off the ground.

This isn't politics; this is suicide. God help us if our enemies conclude that the United States is no longer capable of being serious about intelligence.

READ MORE


image toon gwot nsec = Oby's sand castles v Iran NKorea's rockets

Horrific “Honor”

It was as cold-blooded and vicious an honor crime as any the West has seen, but with one difference. This time, the victim was male.

A 24-year-old Asian man is clinging to life in a British hospital after seven men attacked him last week in London for having a friendship with a married Muslim woman.

The unidentified man, who is Muslim himself and has Danish citizenship, was stabbed twice in the back and beaten so severely with bricks that authorities report he is now blind in one eye and will probably lose sight in the other. Acid was also poured down the victim’s throat, damaging his tongue and throat so severely he will probably never speak again.

“The poor man got up and ran straight into a tree, then staggered back to his house, tugging at his burning clothes and banging on doors, shouting for water,” said one woman who witnessed the attack.

The victim’s body was also doused with acid, burning more than 50 per cent and leaving him in critical condition. News reports state he is not expected to survive. His assailants, police say, were all wearing gloves and masks for protection against the sulphuric acid, ... [ snip]

The motive for the attack, British newspapers report, is that the woman’s family, which is from Pakistan, considered the man’s friendship with her “insulting” to the family’s honor.

Incredibly, London police now expect the Pakistani family to attempt to further wash away more of that “foulness.” The woman, police fear, may be killed next and are trying to figure out how to protect her...

["Trying to figure it out" ? We take children from their parents for far less - why not here where there's no doubt?

Oops, forgot: don't' want to offend anyone.]


READ MORE

It wouldn't happen to the Koran

The Pope has condemned a ' disgusting' taxpayer-funded exhibition in which visitors are urged to deface the Bible.

Visitors were offered pens by gallery bosses so they could scrawl comments on the text - leading to a host of puerile and obscene remarks.

Pope Benedict XVI believes the stunt would not have been contemplated with a copy of the Koran.

Artist Anthony Schrag. He wanted gays and transsexuals who felt left out of religion

[Isn't that 'tolerant'.]

READ MORE

China has pointed questions for US in private

Washington - The United States and China are striking a conciliatory tone in their public comments during economic talks, although that hasn't stopped China from posing some pointed questions behind closed doors about such issues as America's soaring budget deficit to try to reassure China that the U.S. will not let deficits or inflation jeopardize the value of Chinese investments...

[Guess the days of the US asking China 'pointed questons' about its human rights violations are long gone. The consequences of becoming the world's super-debtor.

'Free' health care anyone?]


READ MORE


image toon - intl mny = IOU to China visible from space

Zelaya's Gone, but Democracy Now! Keeps Trying to Bring Him Back

.
... Let's take a moment to review some of the events that led to the Zelayas now finding themselves in their new role as perpetual guests of fellow Marxist President Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua:

  • 1. Officials are investigating allegations that Zelaya stole millions from the Central Bank of Honduras. A security video from the Central Bank of Honduras (now in the possession of the The Washington Times) shows Honduran officials entering the bank and withdrawing millions, which was taken directly to Mr. Zelaya’s chief of staff, Enrique Flores Lanza.
  • 2. Zelaya was planning an illegal referendum that, if successful, would have permitted him to serve a second term as president. This is blatantly illegal under the Honduran Constitution. Honduras’ Supreme Court, the military, its Congress, and the majority of the people were all united in their vigorous opposition to the referendum.
  • 3. The Zelaya administration was coming more and more under the influence of Marxist Hugo Chavez, the soon to be president-for-life of Venezuela. Honduras is a conservative country, and the growing influence of the leftist ideology of Chavez over Zelaya prompted Honduran Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga to declare that Zelaya no longer has:
“…any authority, moral or legal. The legal authority he lost because he broke laws and the moral authority he lost with a discourse full of lies. The most patriotic thing he could do is stay away. Anything else is just trying to impose Hugo Chavez’s project [Socialism] at all costs.”

The Hondurans don’t want Chavez-style authoritarianism, and running Zelaya out on a rail was their way of making that fact known to the world.

Goodman and the folks at Democracy Now! should begin to reconcile themselves to that fact.

READ MORE

FLASHBACKs >

Tossing Free Honduras under the Bus

Obama 'meddles' in Honduras -- and chooses the wrong side

Hondurans unhappy with Obama


.

Obama, Chavez Are Both Nationalizing Private Companies

Washington - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is taking over private companies in order to deal with the economic crisis that has affected both his country and the United States, and the Obama administration is trying to do roughly the same thing, Venezuelan political analyst Dr. Luis Vicente León told CNSNews.com Monday.

READ MORE


image toon intl sclm bbro = Oby drooling over Putin's control of everything

THE CENTER CANNOT HOLD

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has quickly come to an end. His policies are designed to radically re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not mitigate the recession.

The President's $3.6 trillion budget blueprint, by his own admission, redefines the role of government in our economy and society:

  • Almost triple the deficit.
  • Add $6.5 trillion to the national debt.
  • Leave future U.S. taxpayers (I.e., our children) with the tab.
Compared to the do-nothing option, Obama's deficit is more than 2.5 times larger in fiscal year 2013 - and that projection presumes that:

  • There will have been several years of economic recovery.
  • The funds will be returned from the financial bailouts.
  • U.S. forces will have withdrawn from Iraq.
Source: Michael J. Boskin, "The Center Cannot Hold," Hoover Institution, Summer 2009.

READ MORE

POLL: 62% Oppose Federal Bailouts for State Budget Problems

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 20% of adults favor bailing out financially troubled states. Nineteen percent (19%) are not sure which course is best.

These findings are largely unchanged from mid-May when California’s financial problems became national news.

Eighty-two percent (82%) of Republicans and 61% of adults not affiliated with either major political party oppose federal bailout help for states with budget problems.

A plurality (42%) of Democrats agree, but 31% think bailing out the states is a good idea.

Seventy-seven percent (77%) of voters nationwide say the unwillingness of politicians to cut government spending is a bigger problem than the public’s unwillingness to pay higher taxes.

Roughly seven-out-of-10 California voters oppose raising income and sales taxes to meet the state’s massive and growing budget deficit.

Forty-four percent (44%) of American adults say, generally speaking, the government tries to do too much, but 31% believe it doesn’t try to do enough...

READ MORE


image photo - c-art - mny reps - TREKONOMICS

A Chemical Scare Campaign Is Good Business for Some

Last month, the Statistical Assessment Service (STATS), a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization affiliated with George Mason University, released "Science Suppressed: How America became obsessed with BPA,

" a report which accuses the media of ignoring the extensive research of respected scientists and major health agencies in the United States and around the world, which found BPA was not only safe but played an important role in ensuring food safety." [snip]

If you're unfamiliar with Bisphenol A (BPA), it is a chemical used to make lightweight, versatile, durable, high-performance plastics. [like water bottles]

Until recently, this appeared to be nothing more than a typical attempt by liberals to go after business and manufacturing. But as several bloggers have recently pointed out, there appears to be a more sinister motive. You see, the radical environmental groups who fundraise off of this issue, the trial lawyers who line their pockets with class action lawsuits against BPA manufacturers, and the Democratic politicians who score political points by attacking BPA all have one thing in common: They all share the same PR huckster -- David Fenton.

If the name David Fenton of Fenton Communications sounds familiar, it may be because he's the guy who invented the 'General Betray Us' ad campaign that MoveOn.org used to attack General Petreaus... [snip]

Sadly, it appears that these attacks were not mistakes made with the best of intentions, but rather, a racket designed to put money in the pockets of liberal special interests...

READ MORE

What Green Jobs?

President Obama devoted nearly $60 billion of his stimulus package to building a new green-based economy rich in renewable energy and strategies to cut carbon.

But despite the price tag, not one green job yet exists.

It comes down to a problem of etymology. No one can yet agree on what a green job actually is...

[Guess it's now called the 'sixty billion dollar question'. Too bad no one had time to read the thing before they passed it.]

READ MORE

72% Don’t Want Feds Changing Their Light Bulbs

Just 18% of adults think it’s the government’s job to tell Americans what kind of light bulb they use, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Seventy-two percent (72%) say it’s none of the government’s business, and 10% are not sure.

The federal government under an energy bill passed in 2007 is requiring consumers to dump incandescent bulbs, the ones we’ve used for well over a century, for more expensive fluorescent ones. The plan is scheduled to go into effect over the next 10 years in the name of great energy efficiency.

Eighty-three percent (83%) of Republicans and 78% of adults not affiliated with either major political party say it’s not the government’s role to make Americans change their light bulbs. Among Democrats, 58% share that view, but 29% say it is the government’s job.



READ MORE

Democrats search for villains on health care

.
With their health care plans in a holding pattern — and no George W. Bush to kick around anymore — Democrats are casting about for somebody to blame.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn says that Republicans have “perfected ‘just say no.’”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said insurance companies are chalking up “immoral profits.”

But even if they won’t acknowledge it publicly, most Democrats in Congress know the truth: It’s their own colleagues who are slowing down progress in both the House and the Senate...

[Again and again: they don't debate the merits of their ideas but attack anyone who questions...]

READ MORE

White House using class warfare to sell health reform plan

In explaining why it was OK to sock a new 5.4% tax on the highest earners in this country — to pay for health care reform — President Obama’s press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said this:

“The president believes that the richest 1% of this country has had a pretty good run of it for many years.”

Ah. So that’s it. The old “You’ve had it good enough for long enough” policy...

[What has our country come to that a politician at any level can say such a thing and not be thrown out of office?]

READ MORE

Plastic Surgery Tax Eyed As Revenue Raiser

Face-lifts, tummy tucks and hair transplants could be hit with a new tax to help finance the trillion-dollar healthcare overhaul plan, according to sources familiar with the Senate talks.

The Senate Finance Committee has discussed imposing a 10 percent excise tax on cosmetic surgery deemed 'unnecessary' [by whom?] for medical purposes.

[Translation: how dare you pay for for just your own surgery - if you can afford that you should be made to pay for someone else's.

'Home of the free.']


READ MORE


image toon - hcare = My health - your obligation

Rare, Truthful Treat: AP's 'Fact Check' On Obama Presser Hits Surprisingly Hard

.
Associated Press's Calvin Woodward does the primary honors in an AP Fact Check that takes aim at the President's 'accuracy' in his descriptions of his health care bill... [snip]

OBAMA: "It will keep government out of health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your insurance if you're happy with it."

THE FACTS: A commission appointed by the government would determine what is and isn't covered by insurance plans offered in a new purchasing pool, including a plan sponsored by the government. The bill also holds out the possibility that, over time, those standards could be imposed on all private insurance plans, not just the ones in the pool.

OBAMA: "I have also pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our deficit over the next decade, and I mean it."

THE FACTS: White House Budget Director Peter Orszag told reporters this week that the promise 'does not apply' to proposed spending of about $245 billion over the next decade to increase fees for doctors serving Medicare patients.

OBAMA: "You haven't seen me out there blaming the Republicans."

THE FACTS: Obama did so in his opening statement, saying, "I've heard that one Republican strategist told his party that even though they may want to compromise, it's better politics to 'go for the kill."

OBAMA: "If we had done nothing ... you'd have a $9.3 trillion deficit over the next 10 years. Because of the changes we've made, it's going to be $7.1 trillion."

THE FACTS: Obama's numbers are based on figures compiled by his own 'budget office'. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, in its own analysis of the president's budget numbers, concluded that the cumulative deficit over the next decade would be $9.1 trillion.

Woodward et al could have done a bit better. Their "deficit-neutral" fact check point ignored Congressional Budget Office predictions that the legislation will add to the deficit, and to spending.

The AP team could have further pointed to the history of federal programs in general, which rarely if ever stay within their anticipated spending constraints, or to Massachusetts's government-run Commonwealth Care, supposedly a model for much of what is in ObamaCare, where costs are spiraling out of control.

Nonetheless, Woodward and ABC's Jake Tapper remain virtually alone in the White House press corps in their willingness to report negative news about Obama or to even question him on identified analysis items.

Will that ever change?

READ MORE