The Great North American CO2 Sink

[not really readable to most of us humans - it's real science - but thought I'd post as future FLASHBACK when next I reference]

A Large Terrestrial Carbon Sink in North America Implied by Atmospheric and Oceanic Carbon Dioxide Data and Models
S. Fan, M. Gloor, J. Mahlman, S. Pacala, J. Sarmiento, T. Takahashi, P. Tans

Atmospheric carbon dioxide increased at a rate of 2.8 petagrams of carbon per year (Pg C year1) during 1988 to 1992 (1 Pg = 1015 grams). Given estimates of fossil carbon dioxide emissions, and net oceanic uptake, this implies a global terrestrial uptake of 1.0 to 2.2 Pg C year1. The spatial distribution of the terrestrial carbon dioxide uptake is estimated by means of the observed spatial patterns of the greatly increased atmospheric carbon dioxide data set available from 1988 onward, together with two atmospheric transport models, two estimates of the sea-air flux, and an estimate of the spatial distribution of fossil carbon dioxide emissions. North America is the best constrained continent, with a mean uptake of 1.7 ± 0.5 Pg C year1, mostly south of 51 degrees north. Eurasia-North Africa is relatively weakly constrained, with a mean uptake of 0.1 ± 0.6 Pg C year1. The rest of the world's land surface is poorly constrained, with a mean source of 0.2 ± 0.9 Pg C year1.

S. Fan and J. Sarmiento, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. M. Gloor and S. Pacala, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA. J. Mahlman, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory-National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Princeton University, Post Office Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA. T. Takahashi, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA. P. Tans, Climate Modeling and Diagnostics Laboratory, NOAA, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.

[point: the US has reforested an average of 1 million acres per year for ~40 years which, due to the order-of-magnitude increased consumption of CO2 by growing trees vs. mature ones (parents: think feeding a teenager) which results in North America 'uptaking' more CO2 than it 'emits' - and is unique in the world in doing so. That's why all UN conversation focuses solely on emissions - as the US's net CO2 contribution is negative. Easily handled: the IPCC's 'recommendations' simply don't count it, or the US would be lecturing the rest of the world instead of the other way around.]

Read the Full Text