Friday, June 20, 2008
Without a Shot
Al-Mahdi Army militias routed without a shot firedThey came at dawn, thousands of Iraqi troops and US special forces on a mission to reclaim a lawless city from the militias who ran it. By the end of the day, al-Amarah was under Iraqi Government control - without a shot being fired.
Yesterday the city's streets were crawling with Iraqi security forces. Soldiers searched houses as police manned checkpoints and Soviet-era tanks guarded bridges over the Tigris River.
The flood of troops, who had moved into position outside the city a week ago, had encountered no resistance as they moved in yesterday. The leaders of the Shia militias that once ruled as crime bosses and warlords were either gone or in hiding. Even the police chief fled a week ago, fearing arrest for his affiliation to al-Mahdi Army, while the mayor, a member of the Sadrist movement, was arrested.
Locals said that militiamen had been spotted throwing their weapons into the Tigris or trying to hide them along the lush river banks. One man said that he saw two women digging up a stash hidden by a fighter and taking them into a weapons collection point...
[I'm won't say the war is won. Don't tell me it can't be. It's a matter of resolve]
READ MORE
Survey: Americans Dissatisfied With War Coverage
It's not just President George W. Bush and Congress with low approval ratings these days. An online Zogby survey commissioned by The Poynter Institute should be a wake up call for the American news media. They found a "majority of readers, viewers and listeners say they are still far from satisfied with the coverage."
So what's missing from the war coverage? More information about the Iraqi government, stories about the Iraqi people, and chronicling soldiers returning home topped the list of the type of news the respondents said they would like to receive.
READ MORE
Rockets, airstrikes come hours before Gaza truce
[HT:JD]
Jerusalem - Palestinian militants fired 50 rockets and mortars from Gaza toward Israel on Wednesday, just hours before a truce was to take effect.
(Snip) In Gaza, Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh said the truce would ease the lives of Gazans, but success or failure was in Israel's hands.
"The calm is going to bring stability to Israel if they commit themselves to it," he said.
[typical: Palestinians fire the rockets, but success or failure is all up to Israel.]
READ MORE
Islamic cleric is released from jail
Abu Qatada, the radical Islamic cleric described as Osama bin Laden’s “right-hand man in Europe”, has been released from jail after a judge ruled that there were no grounds to keep him in prison.
The decision to allow him to return to his home in London – where he will receive around £1,000 per month in state benefits – made a mockery of the government’s promise to crack down on terror suspects, and embarrassed the Home Office, which had pledged to deport Qatada to Jordan to face terror charges...
READ MORE
ElBaradei warns to resign if Iran threatened
TEHRAN – The head of the United Nations atomic watchdog has said he would offer his resignation if the major powers make serious threats against Iran over its nuclear program.
[this is the guy a few yearrs ago that the world would just need to adjust to a nuclear armed Iran. Threaten already!]
READ MORE
THE MYTH OF VANISHING CO2 EMISSIONS
Environmental activists and some politicians are now promoting the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 60 percent or more by mid-century. CEO William O'Keefe and President Jeff Kueter, both of the George C. Marshall Institute, investigate whether this proposition is achievable and what this would cost Americans. Consider:
• In 2005, the United States emitted just below 6 gigatons of carbon dioxide (a gigaton is one billion metric tons, or 509,400,000,000 cubic meters).
• By 2030, U.S. emissions will rise to 7.9 gigatons; global CO2 emissions are projected to rise to 43 gigatons during this period, according to the U.S. Energy Administration.
• Analyses of various cap and trade proposals put the annual economic cost somewhere between $160 billion and $250 billion in 2015 and $800 billion to over $1 trillion by mid-century.
How efficient are cap-and-trade schemes?
• According to Yale economist William Nordhouse, they are highly inefficient because they imply carbon taxes rising to around $300 per ton in the next two decades; this would be the equivalent of adding 75 cents to the price of a gallon of gasoline.
• The U.S. population is expected to increase from 296 million in 2005 to 325 million in 2020, and economic growth is projected to expand gross domestic product (GDP) to $16 trillion.
• There is no way to accommodate nearly 30 million more people and add $5 billion in economic growth without CO2 emissions growing, say O'Keefe and Kueter.
The bottom line is that a growing population and growing economy are not compatible with lower emissions, given the state of today's technology or the technologies that could be in the market in the next decade, say O'Keefe and Kueter.
READ MORE
Global Warming Skepticism Shocks Chris Matthews
Towing the "Green is Universal," corporate line, MSNBC's Chris Matthews seemed shocked that anyone would dare question whether climate change was real. During a discussion about John McCain's eco-friendly rhetoric the "Hardball" host was dismayed when conservative radio talk show host Heidi Harris called it a move "to the left," as Matthews decried: "You think climate change is an ideological issue?!"
[Calm down Chris, everybody knows it's undisputed fact. Kool Aid?]
READ MORE
Nationalize This
"We can't drill our way out of the problem," goes the Democratic mantra on oil. So what would Democrats do? Some in the party have the worst possible answer: "Nationalize the oil industry."
This week, responding to President Bush's call for more drilling, Democrat Maurice Hinchey said "We (the government) should own the refineries. Then we can control how much gets into the market."
This is what it's about: "control." And it's extremely dangerous for our democracy because once government controls the economy, it controls you, too. Then the Constitution, which guarantees your rights as a citizen of our republic, becomes a dead letter.
What's especially shocking is these two extremists no longer seem out of step with what used to be a centrist Party.
Don't take our word for it. A Rasmussen Poll released Tuesday showed that 37% of Democrats think nationalizing the oil companies is a good idea. Only 32% disagreed with that.
Which makes us wonder: Do they even know that socialism — state ownership of the means of production — has been completely discredited by history?
READ MORE
THE LAW POOR
According to a new report from the United Nations:
• Two in every three people on the planet -- a total of 4 billion -- are excluded from the rule of law.
• Around 40 percent of the developing world's five-year-old children are not registered as even existing.
• India only has 11 judges for every 1 million people.
Later, people will find that the home they live in, the land they farm, or the business that they start, is not protected by legally enforceable property rights.
[The Point: the Rule of Law , and its incalculable benefits, is not a universal given: is was earned, it must be protected, by being followed or changed - never set aside {yes, there's a reason this appears in the immigration section of the Brief}]
READ MORE
Media Ignore Minimum Wage Hike's Impact on May Unemployment Rise
It certainly wasn't surprising how press outlets desperately trying to depict the economy as depression-like were practically giddy following the dour jobs report released by the Labor Department last Friday.
What was shocking given the portion of May's unemployment rate rise attributed to high school and college students looking for summer jobs was that virtually no press outlets considered the impact last year's minimum wage hike might have had on young Americans finding temporary positions between school years.
Consider this op-ed published in Monday's Washington Examiner authored by Kristen Lopez Eastlick, the senior economic analyst at the Employment Policies Institute:
According to economist David Neumark of the University of California at Irvine, for every 10 percent increase in the minimum wage, employment for high school dropouts and young black adults and teenagers falls by 8.5 percent. In the past 11 months alone, the United States' minimum wage has increased by more than twice that amount.Interesting, wouldn't you agree? And, certainly newsworthy.
Yet, from what I can tell, results of Google News and LexisNexis searches didn't find one major mainstream news outlet that offered such analysis in its reporting of Friday's unemployment rise...
READ MORE
NEW YORK'S NOVEL WAY TO KILL CHARTER SCHOOLS
Ten years ago, New York joined the charter school revolution by passing a law to allow these innovative public schools to open; but now, thanks to the state's Department of Labor and a labor-friendly state judge, building a new charter school just got a lot harder and a lot more expensive.
- Last fall, as a sop to labor unions, Labor Commissioner M. Patricia Smith ordered charter schools to adhere to state "prevailing wage" requirements, which mandate paying union wages for construction projects and which typically add 30 percent or more to the cost of a project.
- Although charter schools have always been exempt from this state law, state trial judge Michael Lynch erroneously applied labor law to charter schools, contrary to anything intended by the legislature or precedent.
READ MORE
'Overheated and Amplified'
[HT:SJ]
Fortune magazine reports that Barack Obama is publicly backing away from his stated opposition to Nafta, confirming the private assurances he reportedly offered Canadians that he didn't really mean it...
READ MORE
INNOVATION NATION
Americans like to think they live in the most innovative country in the world. But how do other countries compare?
One measure is the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS), a survey of "innovation indicators and trend analyses," put together by the European Commission. According to the 2007 EIS, the gap between the United States and the European Union (EU) has declined in recent years, but America still leads in most categories. For example:
- Of the 15 possible indicators measured by the EIS, the United States performs better than the European Union in 11 indicators, while the European Union scores above the United States in 4 indicators.
- Although the United States leads the EU in 11 indicators, on 9 of those indicators the United States is outperformed by at least one European country.
- The only two indictors on which the United States outperforms all other European countries are tertiary education and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patents.
- Sweden is the single most innovative country, as a result of its strength in innovation inputs.
- The gross domestic product (GDP) share of early-stage venture capital is more than 50 percent higher in the United States than the European Union.
- There is a large gap between the United States and the European Union in business R&D expenditures, 1.17 percent of EU GDP as compared to 1.87 percent in the United States, which has not decreased; in fact, the United States is expanding its lead in public R&D expenditures and high-tech exports.
- America also leads the rest of the world in patent applications, a key measure of intellectual property.
Thursday, June 19, 2008
.
House Democrats call for nationalization of refineries
House Democrats responded to President's Bush's call for Congress to lift the moratorium on offshore drilling. This was at an on-camera press conference fed back live.
Among other things, the Democrats called for the government to own refineries so it could better control the flow of the oil supply. (Snip)
We (the government) should own the refineries. Then we can control how much gets out into the market.
[so, we're not racing down a path to socialism?]
READ MORE
March to Socialism
I just want to mark our place in time. And here's the latest. A new Rasmussen report telephone survey found -- you ready? Dan, if I asked you how many Americans, what percentage of Americans would oppose the nationalization of our oil companies, Americans, what would you say is a reasonable number? [snip]
DAN: I would say 90? Only crazy activists would be on the other side of that.
GLENN: Yeah, it's a little, a little lower than that. A little lower.
It's actually 47% of Americans are now opposed to nationalizing our oil industry.
By the way, in a completely unrelated story, front page of yesterday's Wall Street Journal, my favorite quote from Barack Obama. He cited new economic forces to explain what appears like a return to older style big government Democratic platforms skeptical of market forces.
He said, "Globalization and technology and automation will all weaken the position of workers." Hey, workers of the world, unite. "It will weaken the position of workers. He said a strong government hand is needed to assure that wealth is distributed more equitably."You know, here's the thing. Could somebody just call up and just say, hey, Glenn, really want to socialize the oil companies because the government is so good at... fill in the blank. Go ahead. Just give me one thing. Give me one thing the government is really, really good at. Anything. Throw it my way. Go ahead.
READ MORE
[ok, the only 'news' in the congressional Democrats piece is that they evidently consider it acceptable to voice such blatantly socialists intentions.
But the Rasmussen poll is truly alarming, not just in it's demonstration of some combination of education failure & media brain washing success that's resulted in a majority of Americans somehow not knowing the inevitable failure that nationalization entails, but in the scary precedent it represents:
it tells the government that it can cause the failure of an industry through regulation, and then use that failure as justification for its assuming control to 'fix' the problem it itself caused.
Scary. Sad. What will our grand children's America look like?]
Obama's Red Roots
It's natural to be skeptical of excessive claims about Obama's radical associations. After all, there are so many. But one bears attention — because it helped him get his start in politics. In 1996, he won an Illinois state senate seat on a "fusion" ticket of the Democratic Party and leftist group called the "New Party."
The New Party, founded in 1992 with 7,000 members at its peak, had been an explicitly anti-capitalist party of ex-Communists, socialists and activists from ACORN, the hard-left group that's constantly in trouble over voter fraud. The New Party didn't ask for Obama's association; he asked for the New Party's endorsement. [snip]
Obama actually had to audition for it. According to a September-October 1995 update on the New Party-aligned Chicago Democratic Socialists of America Web site: "About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates." [snip]
The New Party also has advocated a bill of rights for children, a shorter work week, a universal "social" wage and military spending cuts. These will undermine parental rights, lower competitiveness, lard up welfare and make the U.S. less secure. All are echoed in Obama's proposals. They are the hardest battle cries of the left.
Obama should come clean on why he sought these radicals' support and, better still, disclose just how he intends to pay them back.
READ MORE











