Thursday, March 25, 2010

.

Love those California legislators!

Wanted (No, Needed): PART-TIME LEGISLATURE

Nothing else needs to be said the picture speaks for itself. Paid by our tax money to represent us?????




House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, pictured standing, far right, speaks while colleagues, Rep. Barbara Lambert, D-Milford and Rep. Jack F. Hennessy, D-Bridgeport, play solitaire Monday night as the House convened to vote on a new budget. (AP) The guy sitting in the row in front of these two... he's on Facebook, and the guy behind Hennessy is checking out the baseball scores. And these are only the ones that the camera was able to catch.
These are the folks that can't get the budget out by Oct. 1, Seriously!!! So, we’ve got a 30 day budget extension. Well, guess what, 30 days from now we will be in the same boat. I guess this makes it easy for the news ‘reporters’ as all they have to do is recycle the same headlines from this week and from 2 years ago. And these yo-yo’s will still be playing SOLITAIRE!!!
Are you angry yet?

.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010



[Confusing: when one Republican votes for the thing to get it out of a committee the MSM preface each reference of it with 'bipartisan'.

Yet the bill has actually had bipartisan opposition all year, without exception, and finally passed with only (but not nearly all) Democrat votes - yet you won't even hear the MSM referring to it as controversial? -- despite 13 States immediately filing law suits against it?!?

Has there been any more controversial bill all year???

And now we're subjected to repeated references of Democrat "victory laps" re: its passage without any of our professional journalists reminding the American people that it was THEIR WILL over which the Democrats were 'victorious'.

No bias here - by all mens get your news from TV - move along...]

.

CNN poll: Americans don't like health care bill

Subject: txt hcare POLL:
Washington - A majority of Americans have a dim view of the sweeping health care bill passed by the House, saying it gives Washington too much clout and won't do anything to reduce their own health care costs or federal deficits, according to a new poll released Monday. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll found that 59 percent of Americans opposed the bill, and only 39 percent favored it...

[A twenty point spread. Three times that of Obama's 'landslide' victory in '08. What a great 'victory' for the Democrats over us ignorant masses]

READ MORE


.

Obama basks in glow of health care victory, but now comes the hard part: selling it to the people

Subject: txt 1st hcare lbrty -
President Obama started a victory lap on health care Tuesday, signing it into law at a White House lawn party - and hitting the road to sell it to the American people. That may be the tough part. A national CNN poll last night found Americans opposed the bill 59% to 39%. A majority fear it will cost them money while giving government too much power. Sen. John McCain mocked "champagne toasting" at the White House and pledged a dragged-out fight.

"Outside the Beltway, the American people are very angry"

[Not to worry, our professional media will convince them accept the inevitable and actually get them to thank the Dems in the six months between now and November. Note how they're glossing right over the fact that the 'selling' of the People on Obama's ideas after he passes laws they dislike is evidently not even news worthy/mentionable - no, it's his next challenge {for which he'll be lauded when again victorious, I'm sure}.

As in '08, the MSM is demonstrating its loss of integrity is absolute. ]


READ MORE


.

POLL: 49% Support State Lawsuits Against Health Care Plan

Subject: txt hcare -
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of likely voters finds that 37% disagree and oppose their state suing to challenge that requirement. Fourteen percent (14%) are undecided.

Seventy-two percent (72%) of Republicans and 58% of voters not affiliated with either major party favor such lawsuits. Sixty-five percent (65%) of Democrats are opposed.

READ MORE

[Yet in our MSM...]
.

CBS to Steele: What if People 'Like' ObamaCare? Is RNC too Extreme?

Subject: txt hcare msm - 2010 -

"What if, now that it's a reality and people start to see the benefits, [no bias there] they actually like it?"

Steele replied:

"David Axelrod didn't talk about the $506 billion that's being taken out of Medicare....He didn't talk about the $500 billion in new taxes that are going to be imposed on those small businesses....there's a lot in this bill that have yet to be revealed to the American people. And when it's further revealed, it'll be less – less liked."

After Steele's response, Rodriguez felt the need to incredulously criticize the RNC for being too "extreme" in its opposition:


"I looked on the RNC website this morning. I have to say, I was surprised by what I saw. The home page shows a big photograph of Nancy Pelosi and in huge block letters it says 'Fire Pelosi' ....Isn't this a little bit extreme?...What can you accomplish with this?"

Naturally, Rodriguez failed to mention the latest CBS News poll showing Nancy Pelosi only has an 11% approval rating.

Steele dismissed Rodriguez's characterization:

"Actually, I tamed it down. You know, the reality of it is I don't know why you're surprised. Nancy Pelosi is the architect of the demise, in my view, of one-sixth of our economy. She should be fired for her failure to serve the interests of the American people."

[Get it? With all that's transpired in the last month, it's the Republican actions that are 'extreme'. Of course.]

READ MORE

To 'Indefatigable' Pelosi, Sawyer Wonders What Her Dad and Mom 'Would Have Said About this Moment?'

Subject: txt hcare msm -
ABC anchor Diane Sawyer shared the glow of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's health care policy victory, showing her, in an “ABC News exclusive” interview, a Washington Post with the headline of “Democrats Claim Health Votes” as she wondered:

“What do you think your dad and your mom would have said about this moment?” Sawyer followed up: “Did your dad have a phrase, a sentence that meant the most to you when he'd say it to you, or your mom?”

Pelosi's answer, “make sure you have the votes,” cracked up Sawyer, who chuckled...

[And the thwarted will of the people? Not mentioned.]

READ MORE


.

The Moral Case Against Government Health Care

..
The greatest expansion of American government and the social welfare state since the Great Society passed the House Sunday night. Opponents recognize that this bill violates the most important principles of American government, and as such, is immoral. In a free society, does one individual's needs constitute another individual's obligation to provide? The answer is no; rather, it is the duty of free individuals to decide what and whose needs appear most important to them. In a free society, the individual is of supreme importance and should not to be used as a means to society's ends. The individual has the right to order his actions and possessions in the manner most consistent with pursuing his own happiness and values. This view is consistent with America's founding principles. The Declaration of Independence states:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

The above rights are known as "Natural Rights," and they protect the individual's right to freedom, autonomy, and self-government -- in other words, to take all the actions required to support the furtherance, fulfillment, and enjoyment of one's own life. They provide no material assurances or particular opportunities to the individual, but rather set conditions that allow the individual to decide what use he shall make of the circumstances in which he finds himself -- to act in his own best interest so long as his actions don't infringe on the equally protected rights of others. Based on this logic, government programs that involuntarily transfer or redistribute wealth are immoral because they violate the individual's natural right to order his own actions and possessions. Theft is immoral. Likewise, theft via the government is immoral. Karl Marx and Thomas Jefferson highlight the differences between collectivism and individualism. The philosophy of collectivism regards the individual as a means to society's ends and is thus immoral, whereas individualism respects the freedom and autonomy of each member of society.

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." - Karl Marx, 1875 "A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned." - Thomas Jefferson, 1801

Another important question is: What constitutes a need, and who should decide? Should it be the patient in concert with his or her physician? This seems like the obvious choice. However, if society is paying the cost of whatever service is required to satisfy "the need," then the provision of that service must be regulated to prevent overutilization and runaway costs. In other words, it must be rationed. In a free market, prices perform this rationing function. In the absence of a free market, some third party must ration based on a formula other than price. Rationing by price is moral because this unbiased mechanism allows individuals to maintain complete freedom and autonomy. A patient who cannot afford a service that he deems a "need" is still free if he can pursue any course of action in order to meet that "need." Likewise, a provider who feels that his patient "needs" a service is free if he can pursue any course of action in order to provide that service. Some members of society today confuse the concept of true freedom or liberty with the concept of how many options are available to an individual, and this encourages them to advocate for collectivist schemes to help those who may be less fortunate.

"[Liberty] describes the absence of a particular obstacle -- coercion by other men ... the range of physical possibilities from which a person can choose at a given moment has no direct relevance to freedom. The rock climber on a difficult pitch who sees only one way out to save his life is unquestionably free ... if [he] were to fall into a crevasse and were unable to get out of it, he could only figuratively be called 'unfree,' and that to speak of him as being "deprived of liberty" or of being 'held captive' is to use these terms in a sense different from that in which they apply to social relations." - F.A. Hayek

Unfortunately, the only alternative to rationing through price is rationing through the government, and this is immoral because the decision of what constitutes a "need" is made by a third party with no personal connection to the individual or his circumstances. Ultimately, these decisions are made by those with the most political influence -- a situation that inevitably breeds corruption. These governing bodies do not respect the primacy of the individual, but rather view the individual as a means to society's ends. Bureaucrats don't make decisions about health care according to an individual's "need" or preference, but rather, they ration resources based on a social-driven calculus. As evidence of this, the health care bill under consideration has a Medicare board of unelected officials to determine the program's treatment protocols as a method of limiting costs.




SOURCE

'Emboldened Obama' Just Getting Started on Expanding Government

Subject: txt grn bbro sclm -
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, now chairman of the conservative FreedomWorks organization, tells Newsmax.TV in an exclusive interview that an "emboldened" President Obama, fresh off a big healthcare victory, will redouble his efforts to transform America by escalating the size and reach of government.

"Obama's apparent triumph in altering the one-sixth of the U.S. economy represented by healthcare, immeasurably the likelihood of him saying, 'All right, now it's time to go for climate change.'"

READ MORE

After health, Obama allies zero in on climate

Subject: txt grn engry bdd 2010 - hcar -
After a hard-fought victory on health care reform, President Barack Obama's allies in Congress are setting their sights on climate change...

Environmentalists hope Obama will seize on new political momentum to push forward climate legislation, though.

Senator John Kerry, who has spearheaded climate legislation, said that White House officials can now "pour their energy and attention" into the issue;

"In the wake of health care's passage, we have a winning method to make this the next breakthrough legislative fight,"

[Not to worry - every poll says the majority of Americans don't want this - what can they do, ignore us?]

READ MORE


.

POLL: Voters Take Global Warming Less Seriously

Subject: txt grn engry -
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that just 28% say it is a serious problem, down three points from last month and the lowest level measured since the beginning of 2009.

Forty-two percent (42%) don’t think global warming is a serious problem.

Voters weren't nearly as closely divided on the issue one year ago, when 64% saw global warming as a serious problem and 32% did not.

Women are more likely than men to see global warming as a serious problem. Those voters between the ages of 18 and 29 are more likely than their elders to see the issue as serious.

READ MORE

Britain Bans Ads Exaggerating Danger of Global Warming

Subject: txt grn intl msm - lbrty -
A British agency has banned two government television ads for exaggerating the danger of global warming.

In what we would call public service announcements in the States, the Department of Energy and Climate Change actually used nursery rhymes to scare people into thinking England was in imminent peril as a result of Nobel Laureate Al Gore's favorite money-making theory.

As reported by BBC.com Wednesday:

READ MORE

Senator slams Al Gore on climate 'hoax'

Subject: txt grn -
Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) attacked former Vice President Al Gore on the Senate floor Monday, calling climate change "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people" and claiming that Gore is now "running for cover."

In front of the backdrop of a blown up Weekly Standard cover featuring Gore, Inhofe railed on the former vice president. "After weeks of the global warming scandal, the world's first climate billionaire is running for cover. Yes, I'm talking about Al Gore," Inhofe charged.

READ MORE

We, The People EPA

Subject: txt grn -
Regulation: The New York Times says the EPA should use its authority to regulate our very breath if a Democratic Congress isn't "goaded" into action.

Whatever happened to government of the people?

READ MORE


.


.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010


.

The Reality of Obamacare

[HT:LDot; "$10 billion to pay for 16,500 IRS agents who will collect
and enforce mandatory 'premiums.'" Think about it.]


First: Congratulations to President Obama and the Democratic leadership.

You won dirty against bipartisan opposition from both Congress and the majority of Americans.

You've definitely polarized the country even more, and quite possibly bankrupted us too. But hey, you won.

Bubbly for everyone. Simply, you have nationalized healthcare by proxy. Insurance companies are now heavily regulated government contractors.

Way to get big business out of Washington...

READ MORE

IRS to hire thousands of armed tax agents to enforce health care laws

Subject: txt 1st hcare lbrty bbro -
Top IRS officials have been working with Democrats on Capitol Hill to determine how the agency will enforce President Obama’s new health care law. Republican lawmakers estimate the legislation will require the hiring of many thousands of new (and armed) tax enforcement agents.

While it’s still not known exactly how many will be hired, here’s what’s clear: Under the new law, the IRS is required to fine taxpayers thousands of dollars if they do not purchase health insurance.

In order for the government to enforce compliance, tax authorities will need information, for the first time, about people’s health care...

READ MORE

20 Ways ObamaCare Will Take Away Our Freedoms

Subject: txt hcare 1st lbrty bbro -
... it is worthwhile to take a comprehensive look at the freedoms we will lose. Of course, the overhaul is supposed to provide us with security.

But it will result in skyrocketing insurance costs and physicians leaving the field in droves, making it harder to afford and find medical care. We may be about to live Benjamin Franklin’s adage,


“People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.”


READ MORE

Rush Was Right

[Credit where due.]

USEFUL NICE GUYS

In hindsight Republicans will point the President Obama's Blair House health care meeting with Republicans as the event that enabled Democrats to get to a point where the Senate health care bill could pass.

During the event and immediately afterward, some Republicans were given credit for standing up to the President and attempting to get a leg up, but according to a Democrat leadership aide in the House, the event accomplished exactly what the Democrats and the White House wanted.

"It allowed the Democrats to create the impression that Republicans had had a hand. It allowed the President afterward to claim he had included Republican proposals in the bill, and gave him a clear path to moving the process along, where before he didn't,"

A White House aide, who was involved in planning the media sideshow at Blair said,

"If the Republicans had actually listened to Rush [Limbaugh] and [Mark] Levin and [Fred] Thompson and not attended, we couldn't have built any momentum...'

READ MORE


.

If You’re against Obamacare, You’re Probably a Racist

Subject: txt 1st hcare bdd vals -
Today, the New York Times features an article drawing a direct link between the Obamacare debate and the civil-rights struggle over 40 years ago. The title is “Past Strife and Jeers,” and here is the opening paragraph:

"WASHINGTON — Forty-five years ago, John Lewis began the third of what became society-shifting civil rights marches from Selma to Montgomery, Ala. On Sunday, the anniversary of that famous trek, he joined hands with fellow House Democrats and marched past jeering protesters into the Capitol to remake the nation’s health care system..."

We have no tolerance for intolerance and condemn anyone who would resort to racist name-calling. Shame on anyone who did.

But shame on the New York Times for comparing those who protested the Democrats’ health-care policy with the virulent southern racists who participated in violent and often deadly protests against civil-rights demonstrators.

Give us a break.

The Left’s plan for November is to promote exactly this kind of thinking, shaming opponents into staying at home rather than going to the polls to vote the bums out, while fooling proponents that opposition is nothing more than the most atavistic form of prejudice.

With every poll showing that far more voters hate Obamacare than love it (with the balance made up of the lukewarm on both sides of the issue), this is the New York Times’s effort to help shift voter intensity — which spells turnout in November — in favor of Obamacare.

We suspect the electorate won’t prove so gullible. The Old Grey Lady is not as smart as she thinks she is, nor are Americans the ninnies she believes they are.

READ MORE

New CNN Poll: 59% Oppose Obamacare

Subject: txt 1st hcare -
...Just 39 percent of the poll’s 1,030 respondents said they favored the bill. These numbers shouldn’t come as a surprise — even to the White House. In fact, The Washington Post reported this morning that

“President Obama is set to begin an immediate public relations blitz reshaping the legislation’s image"

[So many racists.

Unfortunately, after the absurd success of '08, the Left is now convinced they (with the MSM as key component) can sell the American public on anything given time - and they've 7 months...]


READ MORE

America’s Day of Wreckoning — the Socialist Putsch Comes to Washington

.
The peaceful, patriotic millions who marched over the course of the year were virtually ignored by the media and certainly ignored by the President. Big media only deemed fit to cover the people’s revolution long enough to libel them and smear them with vulgarities (“tea baggers“). This campaign of destruction culminated Saturday in the specious charge that a protester shouted “ni**er” at the Congressional Black Caucus.

The only problem with all this was that the charges were false. Video evidence proved that no one shouted “ni**er” or “faggot.” Is it a coincidence that after a year of millions marching against this ugly leftist power grab, that on the day before the vote both racist and homophobic slurs were allegedly hurled?

The daily drumbeat of lies and smear is so relentless that it has lost its sting. It’s like water off a duck’s back. But for the first time, America is getting a taste of it. Ordinary Americans are being smeared and slandered. And the silver lining here is that the American people will never trust the Democrats or big media again...

READ MORE


.

Al Sharpton: 'The American Public Overwhelmingly Voted for Socialism When They Elected President Obama'

Al Sharpton:




Sharpton, the founder of the National Action Network and talk radio host told Fox News on March 21, during their special coverage of the House of Representatives' passage of health care reform legislation, this victory for President Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would begin "transforming" the country.

"First of all, then we have to say the American public overwhelmingly voted for socialism when they elected President Obama," ... "Let's not act as though the president didn't tell the American people - he was overwhelmingly elected..."


[Tell: true, but the MSM hid it, Overwhelming: 7.1% {vs. Reagan's >18%}.

Still, past time the unvarnished truth slips out. NOW does America know what it's up against?]


READ MORE

It's a Civil War: What We Do Now

Subject: txt 1st 2010 hstry edu vals -
A terrible thing happened to America on Sunday, March 21, 2010. The country took its biggest step ever down a road diametrically opposed to its original intent of keeping the state small so that the individual can be free and great.

Therefore, in this unprecedented crisis of values, this is what needs to be done:

1. Know and teach America's core values. We got to this point solely because over the past few generations, Americans have forgotten the values that have made America distinctive and great... [snip]

2. Recognize that we are fighting the left, not liberals. Liberalism believed in American exceptionalism; the left not only does not believe in it, the left opposes it.,, [snip]

3. Democrats should be referred to as Social Democrats. This is not meant to be a slur, but there is no longer any difference between what is now known as the Democratic Party and the Social Democratic parties of Europe... [snip]

4. 6. Do not let other matters distract. Neither Republicans nor conservatives are united on every issue facing America. Immigration is one example. But we are united on the big government vs. free individual issue, which, more than anything else, has defined America. If we allow any other domestic issue to divide us, we will lose... [snip]

5. Our motto: "The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." It encapsulates this epic battle of American values versus leftist values.

6. Acknowledge that we are in a non-violent civil war. The fact is that the left and the rest of the country share almost no values. The American value system and the leftist value system are irreconcilable. If the left wins, America's values lose. If American values prevail, the left loses.

After Sunday's vote, for the first time in American history, one could no longer confidently believe that the American system will prevail.

And if we don't fight for it, we don't deserve it.

READ MORE


[The challenge:

Everyday Americans will need overcome their two greatest disadvantages is defending their values from the ceaseless onslaught of Progressivism:

1) The aversion of good people to imagine what bad people are capable of. and so slow recognition of evil being done {the enabler of tyrants throughout history}, and

2) The disinclination of conservatives toward 'activist' activities, as contrary to their self-reliant/libertarian/live-and-let-live values.

This combination of traits assures defeat over time, as it faces the opposite in liberal-progressivism:

> Belief in progressive values is self-evidence or superior intellect, and is accompanied with a moral obligation to direct the masses for their own good, and

> The altruism of this end justifies any-and-all means toward achieving - chief among them being stealth and deception, such as secured their virtually monopolies of key social institutions (academia, media, public employees).
{exaggeration? the nationalization of college tuition loans in a 'health care' bill?}

The point:

Everyday busy/self reliant/minding-their-own-business Americans need wake up to the reality that progressive-liberals, by their nature, fervently believe that our business is their business to manage and consider no means toward doing so beyond bounds.

Eternal counter-activism [action] is required or the individual liberty this country was founded on will be consumed by the never ending assault of collectivism.


I.e., it's our turn.





.

Monday, March 22, 2010


.

[HT:MC]



READ MORE


.

The real arithmetic of health care reform

Subject: txt 1st hcare -
On Thursday, the Congressional Budget Office reported that, if enacted, the latest health care reform legislation would, over the next 10 years, cost about $950 billion, but because it would raise some revenues and lower some costs, it would also lower federal deficits by $138 billion.

In reality, if you strip out all the gimmicks and budgetary games and rework the calculus, a wholly different picture emerges: The health care reform legislation would raise, not lower, federal deficits, by $562 billion...

READ MORE


[click to enlarge]
.



[If we're foolish enough to buy a diamond for a dime...]
.

Health Care Bill, CBO Estimates Based on 'Nefarious' Assumptions

Subject: txt 1st hcare = Economist Morici:



That critic was University of Maryland economist Peter Morici, who expressed skepticism of the assumptions built into the health care reform bill, projected that it would raise costs for many average families and it would add "substantially" the federal deficit.

"There's a lot of assumptions in this bill that are kind of nefarious, uh, and I believe that the typical American family will pay $1,000 to $2,000 more for coverage for a family of four,"

READ MORE


.

What America Will Look Like If The White House Gets Its Way

.
America stands on the precipice of sweeping liberal health care reform that will radically reshape one-sixth of the U.S. economy, and a 153-page House bill is all that stands between us and a fundamentally changed America.

What will that change look like? Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said, “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,” and President Barack Obama said, “By the time the vote has taken place, not only will I know what’s in it, you’ll know what’s in it.”

In other words, here’s a ticket to ride, get on board, we can’t tell you where it’s going, but you’ll like it once you get there. We promise.

A picture of America’s future under Obamacare can be revealed, though, after peeling away the pages and digging through the dirt. Here’s 10 things you can expect:


  • 1. A Massively Engorged Government, to the tune of $2.5 trillion in new entitlement spending. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), new entitlement spending in the plan would cost $216 billion by 2019, then increase by 8 percent every year thereafter.
  • 2. A Cornhusker Kickback for All. No, special deals aren’t removed from Obamacare this time around. Instead, the House bill extends new federal funding for Medicaid to all states. Incidentally, you’re paying for it.
  • 3. A Freight train of taxes, slamming the American people in 2018. You’ve heard of the “Cadillac” tax on high-cost insurance plans? It will be pushed back to 2018, and given the way “high-cost” plans will be defined, a large segment of the middle class would get hit with the tax over time.
  • 4. Beware the shape-shifting tax monster. New taxes will take many forms, including taxes on prescription drugs, medical devices (like wheel chairs), and health insurance.
  • 5. Unconstitutional mandates, courtesy of Congress. Don’t want to buy health insurance? Congress will penalize you if you don’t, regardless of income.
  • 6. Higher health care costs will be sneaking in. The plan gives subsidies to low-to-moderate wage families, but the subsidies will increase at a lower rate than the rate at which premiums increase. In other words, those families will pay more every year.
  • 7. Lights out for small businesses. Companies that hire certain low-income Americans will have to pay $3,000 per employee, per year, even if the company offers insurance.Oh, and if a company employs 50 or more workers, they’ll face higher tax penalties to the tune of $2,000 per full-time employee.
  • 8. Abortions. You will pay for them, like it or not. The House bill includes major funding for community health centers with no restrictions on federal taxpayer funding of abortions.
  • 9. Let's dampen investment while we're at it. The House bill slaps a 3.8% tax on investment income.
  • 10. It’s not a federal system, after all. States will have less power. They’ll no longer have authority to regulate health care premiums. Instead, the federal government will take on the job. States and local governments won’t be able to control their own employee health plans; they’ll have to abide by new federal regulations.

READ MORE




.

Health Overhaul's Assault On Business

Subject: txt 1st hcare sclm bbro mny -
Taxes: If ObamaCare becomes permanent, no one will suffer more than U.S. businesses. They'll face higher taxes, more regulations and a higher cost of capital. But don't take our word for it. Go ask Caterpillar.

The heavy-equipment giant reckons its insurance costs will go up 20%, or $100 million, the first year after the health care system is overhauled, and may go even higher. Multiply that by literally tens of thousands of companies nationwide, large and small, and ask yourself what effect it will have toward the goal of "jobs, jobs, jobs" the White House so recently assured us was Job 1...

READ MORE

[It's never been about health 'care'.]


.

Obama Supporter: ‘What’s Wrong With A Little Bit Of Socialism?’

Subject: txt 1st hcare sclm -
Yesterday, we attended an impromptu Tea Party outside the Evanston, IL office of Democrat Rep. Jan Schakowsky. Below are some photos and our in-depth video report documenting the event. Very few people turned out, but that didn’t prevent the scene from turning dramatic as a couple of Obama supporters tossed around accusations of racism, called everyone idiots, and asked the absurd question: “What’s wrong with a little bit of Socialism?”



READ MORE


.


.

Barbarians at the Gates

Subject: txt hcare -
If you're not overly concerned with the government takeover of a sixth of our nation's economy {and all the individual liberty it will obliterate in the process}, I have a video recommendation: The Barbarian Invasions.

Set in Canada with French dialogue and English subtitles, it won last year's Academy Award for best foreign film, and Americans should view it if only to see how much worse being sick is when government controls health care.

The Barbarian Invasions documents the mediocrity, rationing, mindless bureaucracy, corruption, and elitism that inevitably follows government involvement in anything...

READ MORE



.

Socialism Vs. Capitalism: Illustrated on Film

Subject: txt sclm bdd vals bbro -
Although he probably didn’t mean to say this, director Godfrey Reggio’s excellent 1982 film Koyaanisqatsi has a sequence that beautifully illustrates the failure of large socialized programs vs free market capitalism. This illustration reveals why if government spending often results in poor services and bankrupt results over time.



Here’s the clip. We start with scenes of New York majesty followed by a street slum, followed by rows of project apartment buildings as urban blight. Then, at the end, we’re shown gleaming glass towers which are the product of free market capitalism. The project buildings were products of President Johnson’s war on poverty which spent billions and did exactly what you’d expect billions of tax dollars thrown at an abstract problem like poverty would do. Those apartment buildings would have gone up in the 60s. The film was shot around 1979. Less than 20 years. Think on that when you watch the clip above.

That’s government in action right there. Some of those buildings were barely 20 years old, if that. And they want to take over 1/6th of our economy, the health care business, and manage it the way they do everything else. You know, as effectively as Medicare, Social Security, The Post Office, Amtrak which are all about to go under. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae? Failing badly. Hey, why not just show the government debt while we’re at it to see how well they run things. They’ve created trillions in debt based on promises they made. Promises made by politicians that you and your descendants would be footing these bills. They didn’t ask for your consent. Just as they are ignoring the public’s will with the health care bills.

Governments don’t produce, they consume. They take from the people who create things and convert some of those resources into “benefits”. These benefits are, more often than not, bribes to ease us into letting them keep spending our money like mad. At some point, a long time ago, they stopped caring about wanted and started telling us what was good for us. They began taking more and more tax dollars and bribing the least productive citizens so they’d have voters who can override the productive citizens if they complained too much.
They used a divide and conquer strategy. They promised every splinter group what they wanted, but what they got is something else.

Nothing the government does is created out of thin air. It’s made from the wealth it has taken from others. While the free market has created many wonders on its own, most of the government’s great works are in the distant past and they’re falling apart from neglect. Or they’re maintained local governments or free enterprise. Most of the great towers of Manhattan and other cities were built by companies who earned their own wealth to build them. The rotting projects that have fallen into disarray were neglected by a government that promised those people they’d be lifted from poverty. Instead it segregated then into a decaying hell and trapped them into a cycle of dependence.

Tax dollars don’t solve problems. Neither does government.

READ MORE


.

ObamaCare: a social justice nightmare for the whole world

Subject: txt intl hcar - sclm -
According to AP reports, “Catholic nuns are urging Congress to pass President Barack Obama’s health care plan, in an unusual public break with bishops who say it would subsidize abortion.”

Reportedly, 60 leaders of religious orders sent lawmakers a letter pleading with them to pass the Senate healthcare bill. The AP clearly has not noticed the virtual ongoing war within the Catholic Church, especially with regards to government responsibility as opposed to private/church responsibility.

In no sphere is this internal war more evident than when it comes to matters involving the Church’s Doctrine on Social Justice...

READ MORE



.

Is President Obama At War With America?

.
If a frontal assault on the foundational principals and values of American life can qualify as being “at war” - then yes, Barack Obama is in combat with our country... [snip]

Yet at the epicenter of all of this – all the bribes, manipulations, and heavy-handed mandates – is the narrow, political self-interest of one man: Barack Obama. America’s cultural “right” decries the loss of freedom and the rise of abusive government, while the “left” decries a government that lines the pockets of for-profit corporations (companies that are presumed to be “greedy”), all for the benefit of one self-serving politician.

This is the assault on America’s foundational principals and values. It is the assault of governmental cronyism, on our basic understandings of what is right, and fair...

READ MORE


.


.