The seeds of the so-called health care crisis were planted long ago, and quite consciously and deliberately
If there were ever any doubt that Barack Obama personifies the Crisis Strategy, it should long since have been removed for anyone with a mind.
For those of you who aren't familiar with it, the Crisis Strategy was the brainchild of two radical socialist college professors, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. The idea was to overwhelm government with demands for services to the point where the system would collapse and provide an opening for the socialists to take over.
Their strategy was behind creation of the National Welfare Rights Organization in the 1960s and 1970s which dramatically increased the welfare roles and caused the near bankruptcy of New York City in 1975; creation of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), prime instigators of the mortgage meltdown; the national Motor Voter law signed by President Clinton in 1993, which opened the floodgates to vote fraud, and the illegal immigrant amnesty movement.
As we all should know by now, Barack Obama worked with and trained ACORN workers for many years, and is known and supported by all the major players in this movement.
Healthcare nationalization is a major component of this strategy.
The Left has agitated almost since the turn of the last century for some kind of socialized healthcare system. In fact, from 1939 forward, practically every Congressional session proposed national healthcare legislation. As aptly described in an incisive analysis of Medicare by the Cato Institute:
For more than 50 years before the 1965 enactment of Medicare, the American people repeatedly rejected the idea of government-mandated health insurance. Yet advocates of such federal power inside and outside of government did not take no for an answer. Year after year they kept coming back--pursuing incremental strategies, misrepresenting their proposals, even distributing propaganda paid for with government money in apparent violation of existing law.
Their dream was partially realized with creation of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 as part of President Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society." The stated goal of these programs was to provide comprehensive healthcare for seniors and the poor. As the programs grew, the Left clamored for ever more benefits to these groups and ever expanding definitions of covered individuals.
Like any free good, demand for services under these programs has skyrocketed. Spending levels were insignificant in the early years,
but today Medicare and Medicaid today comprise 36 percent of total US healthcare spending.
In 2006,
Medicaid spending alone totaled $314 billion.
For perspective, this is roughly equivalent to the baseline defense budget. In 2008, federal Medicaid and Medicare spending totaled $676 billion. Comprising only 2 percent of the federal budget in 1967,
these two programs alone today consume 23 percent of total federal spending.Corrected for inflation, total federal and state government spending on healthcare has increased by 2,591 percent since Medicaid and Medicare funding began in 1967. That is a real annual growth rate of 8.4 percent, almost three times the annual rate of economic growth for the same period.[1]All these effects were
predicted by economists, and we were repeatedly warned.
The Left knew...
[snip]The left has attacked the private healthcare system from another angle as well: malpractice lawsuits. It has gone largely unreported in the mass media, but the dramatic expansion of all forms of liability lawsuits since the 1960s is the result of
a deliberate, organized effort by leftist law professors to turn civil courts into agents of income redistribution.
We see the consequences of their handiwork directly in the increased cost of products, liability insurance of all kinds, and the decline or in some cases elimination of domestic industries. According to a
study performed by the Pacific Research Institute (PRI),
the United States pays out $589 billion per year in excessive tort litigation. That is approximately 5 percent of GDP and costs a family of four on average about $8,000 per year... [snip]Let me put this as bluntly as possible. The Left has never cared about the elderly or the poor, but ruthlessly uses them as part of their long-term strategy to overburden private healthcare until it ultimately collapses. It is a power grab, pure and simple. There is nothing more to it.
While doubtless some think they are doing good, the ultimate goal, as elucidated by the Left, has everywhere and always been Socialism.
Can you see the Left laughing at you?
[Q: How can we control a government that controls our health care?
A: We can't, its leverage over us will be nearly absolute: any move to cut taxation will be immediately answered with its detrimental effect to our 'care' - reference California cutting emergency services {police, firefighters} first whenever voters push for reduced spending.
More, Highly Recommended > ]READ MORE
