Monday, February 9, 2009

How the News Became Propaganda

The never-ending campaign of President Barack Obama finds a cornerstone in 24-hour television network CNN.

CNN, home of Wolf Blitzer and Larry King Live among other talking heads, now leads the Newsfront Cult called Obamamania.

While the viewers of most television networks watch the news, CNN viewers “wear the news”:



“Apparently CNN, having abandoned any effort to appear impartial, is now selling T-shirts that commemorate Obama’s newborn presidency,” reader Fred Dardick wrote in a Canada Free Press (CFP) letter to the editor yesterday.

CNN T-shirts include slogans such as “Obama raises hand, lifts a nation” and “Obama: It’s time to remake America”.

“This is anti-American to the core as far as I am concerned. How is it possible for a major news organization to get away with this?”

CNN is not only cashing in on the sales of the T-shirts, it provides tangible proof that “The News is Propaganda”.

READ MORE

Mission residents reject American Apparel
CALIFORNIA

San Francisco Chronicle, by C.W. Nevius Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 2/8/2009 11:09:12 AM Post Reply
Congratulations to the residents of Valencia Street. After a rowdy and sometimes misleading campaign, they managed to stop American Apparel - a socially conscious, popular, American-run clothing store - from moving into one of the street's vacant storefronts. (Snip)

It's another through-the-looking-glass moment in San Francisco. They love the product but hate the store solely because there are about 260 of them worldwide. That means it's a chain and unwelcome under any circumstances.

READ MORE



OSHA?

Friday, February 6, 2009




Solis Senate Session Postponed in Wake of Tax Lien Revelations

"Some outstanding for as long as 16 years.
This is beginning to be some kind of sick joke."



[Q: Why did Obama pick a Republican {Judd Gregg} to head the Dept. of Commerce?
A: He needs at lease one nominee who's paid his taxes.]
.

.
When it comes to taxes, more Americans than ever say, 'Pay up'
Daschle's, Geithner's, and Killefer's tax missteps come at time when 89 percent of Americans say it's unacceptable to fudge. The tax woes of three of President Obama’s top-level appointees come at a touchy time.Amid deep economic troubles and taxpayer-funded bailouts and stimulus packages, many Americans are supersensitive to double standards between political and business elites and “the rest of us.”
READ MORE





I Repeat: Time To Go, Mr. Geithner
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner stood alongside President Obama in a White House press briefing yesterday.(Snip)Only a day earlier, Pres. Obama said there should be no double standard when it comes to paying taxes. However, Mr. Geithner is guilty of a double standard. (Snip) Americans do not want tax cheats and tax dodgers in critical leadership positions.(Snip)Timothy Geithner should resign.
READ MORE


.

The New Era of Irresponsibility

Last October, while campaigning in Toledo, Barack Obama called for "a new ethic of responsibility." The nation's economic troubles, he said, occurred partly because "everyone was living beyond their means," including politicians who "spent money they didn't have." In his inaugural address last month, Obama regretted "our collective failure to make hard choices" and heralded "a new era of responsibility."
READ MORE

The only thing we have to fear is catastrophe itself

The public discourse style of Barack Obama underwent an abrupt shift when hope and change gave way to threat and forewarning. Early on during the campaign, audiences at Obama's primary post-election rallies cried and swooned during his speeches (snip) Obama the President has morphed into something different. Obama the Scolder.
READ MORE

Obama pushes stimulus; reminds he won

President Obama used the announcement of restrictions on executive compensation for banks receiving federal aid to remind Congress and the American public who won the election and to push for passage of his recovery plan.

In a reprisal of one of the main themes of his fall campaign, Obama answered critics of his proposed stimulus package -- saying it was not just a plan for short-term spending- and used strong language to urge Congress to "act without delay" in passing the plan.

[I.e., they're using the cover of 'crisis' to sneak through their special-interests paybacks. The more time the public has to learn of this bill, the less it likes it (the numbers are plunging daily) - hence the push to 'act now right now' {sounds just like global warming, doesn't it?}]

READ MORE


Doubts grow among Americans over stimulus bill

ATLANTA - Americans voice growing concern over the cost of President Barack Obama's economic stimulus plans and assail as a weakness the disagreement in Washington over how to spend the money. Two opinion polls show support dwindling. In a Rasmussen Reports survey, 37 percent of Americans backed the legislation in Congress, down from 45 percent two weeks ago, while 43 percent opposed it.
READ MORE
[Heard on the nightly news last night that support slipped another 3% yesterday, down to 34%]

The Stimulus: 300,000 Jobs for Illegals

[Exhibit 'A']

If enacted, the Senate stimulus bill would fund over $100 billion in new government construction projects with the goal of providing additional jobs to unemployed Americans. The House-passed stimulus bill [due only to citizen activism] contains explicit language to bar employment of illegal immigrants in these construction projects.

If the Senate version of the bill becomes law, a great number of the workers employed in government construction programs will, in fact, be illegal immigrants.

[If at first you don't succeed, lie, lie again]

READ MORE

McCain on Stimulus: Having No Bill Would Be Better Than Having This Bill

Former Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said Wednesday that the president’s economic stimulus bill is unacceptable to Senate Republicans. ''’No bill’ is better than this bill,'' McCain told CNSNews.com just outside the Senate chamber. (Snip) ''We think payroll tax cuts, according to economists, are the most important way to go.''

READ MORE

Sarkozy promises tax cut to protect French jobs

PARIS - The French government will scrap a costly local business tax in 2010 and is ready to consider cutting income tax in an effort to temper the impact of the economic crisis, President Nicolas Sarkozy said on Thursday.

[Great: we're forced to look to France for sanity. I guess the laws of economics just work differently over here?]

READ MORE

What's in the Bill

.
Tom Coburn yesterday:

We are going in exactly the wrong direction. We ought to be standing on the principles that made this country great. There ought to be a review of every program in the Federal Government that is not effective, that is not efficient, that is wasteful or fraudulent, and we ought to get rid of it right now. We ought to say, Gone, to be able to pay for a real stimulus plan that might, in fact, have some impact.

I would be remiss if I didn't remind everybody that next week we are going to hear from the Obama administration wanting another $500 billion. Outside of this, they are going to want another $500 billion to handle the banking system. Still not fixing the real disease—the pneumonia—we are going to treat the fever or treat the cough, but we are not going to treat the real disease. Until we treat the real disease, this is pure waste. It is worse than pure waste. It is morally reprehensible, because it steals the future of the next two generations. [in future liberties as well as dollars]

I am going to wind up here and finish, but I wanted to spend some time to make sure the American people know what is in this bill. I think once they know what is in this bill, they are going to reject it out of hand. Let me read for my colleagues some of the things that are in this bill...

[Recommended {it's your money} > ]

READ MORE


Unhappy voters jam Capitol Hill phone lines

.
WASHINGTON -- The recent debate over the nearly $900 billion economic stimulus plan and revelations of tax problems by three Obama administration appointees have voters angrily jamming phone lines on Capitol Hill to air their frustrations to their elected representatives. (Snip) Capitol operators tell CNN Radio that phone lines have been jammed for the past two weeks, sometimes prompting busy signals.

READ MORE

Reply 1 - Posted by: hopster, 2/5/2009 4:52:55 AM

Too bad the idiots in Congress don't get it. I paid my mortgage, I pay my taxes. I don't want a bailout, I just want them to keep their hands off of my pocketbook.

[And you?

Obama
'opinion line': 202.456.1111 mailto:president@whitehouse.gov
Pelosi
(202) 225-0100
http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
Reid
1-866-SEN-REID (736-7343)
http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
.


Iraq

.
Landslide election wins for Iraq PM
Baghdad - Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki won landslide victories over Shi'ite rivals in provincial elections, reflecting a seismic shift in the political landscape, preliminary results issued Thursday showed. Results showed big wins for the prime minister's State of Law coalition in the capital Baghdad and the second largest city Basra (Snip) Maliki's allies also scored smaller but substantial victories in eight of nine other Shi'ite provinces in the south.
READ MORE



Moqtada al-Sadr 'to suffer heavy defeat in Iraq election'
Moqtada al-Sadr, the firebrand Iraqi cleric, who once posed the greatest threat to British influence in Iraq, has suffered a significant defeat in the country's local elections, results are set to show. British military and intelligence officials in Iraq are confident that Mr Sadr's political allies have been all but routed in the elections. Iraq held local elections last weekend which passed off largely peacefully with results set to be formally declared on Feb 22.
READ MORE
.

Obama on collision course with military over Iraq?

It appears from press reports that the generals responsible for Iraq - David Petreaus and Ray Odierno, along with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Defense Secretary Robert Gates - are lining up in opposition to the president's planned 16 month withdrawal timetable.

CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.



Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, "Petraeus made the mistake [?] of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama."

In other words, Obama is ignoring the advice of his generals on the ground in Iraq as well as the military minds at the Pentagon and is going ahead anyway with his withdrawal plans.

[but to listen to the Obama administration staffer, it was Petraeus that made a mistake?]

READ MORE

New Hampshire Leads Next American Revolution?

Americans fed up with the unbridled endless federal assault on private earnings, assets and rights, and looking for what they can do to put a stop to the rush of socialist tyranny being fast-tracked through the leftist congress, or signed into law by Obamessiah executive order, should take a close look at what the New Hampshire legislature has already done!

Four New Hampshire legislators introduced HCR-6 to re-invoke states rights enumerated in Jefferson’s and Madison’s Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. [2] The resolution is a clear shot across the bow of the New Leftist Administration in Washington DC, which is rushing to expand federal control over every aspect of American life, industry and enterprise.

HCR-6 borrows much of its text from Jefferson’s Kentucky Resolutions, but adds more specific warnings concerning several real affronts to state and individual rights currently under attack by the new Washington elite. [snip]

That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually.

The first ten amendments of our constitution, our Bill or Rights, establish very limited powers for the federal government. Amendment IX states that “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

Amendment X says it all – “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

[If only we were still a nation of law]

READ MORE


STIMULUS PLAN SHOULD NOT INCLUDE EDUCATION SPENDING

Congressional leaders recently unveiled a draft of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Widely touted as an economic stimulus package, the $825 billion draft legislation includes as much as $142 billion for education -- roughly twice the annual budget of the entire Department of Education. Should it pass, this legislation will dramatically increase the role of the federal government in education, says Dan Lips, a senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation and a senior fellow with the Goldwater Institute.

The plan would spread the funding among early education, K-12 and higher education programs, and in order to access the funding states will have to comply with a host of new regulations. Setting aside the fact that increasing federal spending on education will not improve the economy, and that a federal bailout for state governments is irresponsible, there are a few more reasons that this plan is bad for states:

  • Experience shows that more K-12 spending does not significantly improve educational performance.
  • Federal early childhood education programs have not provided lasting benefits to disadvantaged children.
  • The proposal does not address waste in the Department of Education budget.
  • The spending package would prohibit school choice.
Instead of increasing federal spending -- and federal debt -- the federal government should help states meet current fiscal challenges by offering state policymakers greater flexibility to prioritize how federal education dollars are allocated to best meet their students' needs.

[But schools choice and greater flexibility would transfer power away from Washington...]

READ MORE

More Gun Control Introduced in Congress

The liberals are at it again. In a new bill introduced the first day of present session of Congress, and with zero coverage from the MSM.

H.R. 45 (Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009) targets all gun owners in the U.S.A.

It requires, within the first two years, that all new guns be registered. The bill goes retroactive after two years.

READ MORE

"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
-- Thomas Jefferson

"To disarm the people is the most effective way to enslave them."
-- George Mason



"OPPOSE H.R. 45 (Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009)"


House-Pelosi: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
YOUR Congressman: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

or: Speed Message them with your personal distribution list...
and as always, pass it on...

Obama hates white people and wants them to die

With nearly 1.5 million people in the mid-west without power during a cold snap, what other possible reason is there that this new "competent" administration and FEMA would be failing so spectacularly in helping in this natural disaster?

It's got to be that Obama hates white people and wants them to die.

Of course, I am just aping what lefty blogs were saying about Bush less than 24 hours after Katrina's hurricane winds stopped blowing. But AP is reporting that Midwest disaster relief people are none too pleased with our new president's FEMA.

In Kentucky's Grayson County, there are 25 National Guardsmen there to help - but no chain saws to cut away fallen limbs and trees. EM Director Randell Smith is quoted as saying,

"We've got people out in some areas we haven't even visited yet, ... We don't even know that they're alive."

Smith is also quoted as saying that FEMA is a "no show."

What's that? Here we are 2 weeks after the storm ended and still no FEMA? I demand a Congressional investigation. And let's get all the anchors and media people down here pronto. People's lives are at stake. For all we know, there are babies being eaten and people jumping off their roofs committing suicide because FEMA is nowhere to be found.

And where is our president? Shouldn't he be visiting these ravaged areas?

Isn't it interesting that now that we have a Democrat as president that all of a sudden, disaster relief is a state and local matter and the federal government should stand aside and allow them to do their jobs?

READ MORE


Hollywood to Produce Yet Another Leftwing Box Office Bomb

The most recent such box office failure of a leftwing film is "Che" which so far has grossed a grand total of only a million bucks. Perhaps the producers knew in advance that this flick would be a bomb which is why it is already available on Pay-Per-View. Remember Oliver Stone's "W?" If you have forgotten it even existed, that is because it died a quick death at the box office immediately upon release last October.

Both of these movies suffered exactly the same fate as all the other leftwing movies produced in the past few years by Hollywood. "Redacted?" DEAD. "Rendition?" DEAD."Syriana?" DEAD. "Stop Loss?" DEAD. And on and on and on it goes. So do you think Hollywood has finally learned its lesson? According to Variety, the answer is no:

Warner Bros. has set Aaron Sorkin to write "The Challenge," a courtroom drama about the effort by Swift and Georgetown U. law professor Neal Katyal to ensure a fair trial for Osama bin Laden's driver, Salim Hamdan, who'd been held at Guantanamo Bay for five years.

It sounds like the perfect formula for box office failure. And yet Hollywood will probably not learn the lesson even after "The Challenge" flops bigtime as it inevitably will.

READ MORE

The true face of Hollywood

Back in 2004, a smart, good-looking moderate Republican Hispanic ran for Congress. At the time Victor Elizalde was just under 40 years old and working as an executive at a big-time Hollywood studio. As an ethnic minority, a family man and a rare open conservative in an industry dominated by liberals, Mr. Elizalde represented hope and change for the Republican Party.

Yet because he was running for Henry A. Waxman´s 'safe seat', Mr. Elizalde got no support from the Republican Party . In fact, no one in the party´s leadership took notice of him. As a result Mr. Waxman trounced Mr. Elizalde with 71 percent of the vote.

Mr. Elizalde has since moved on with his life and is no longer pursuing a political career. Mr. Waxman has run virtually uncontested for 35 years now. And he causes nothing but problems for Republicans. To hear him speak, you´d think the Grand Old Party is the No. 1 scourge in the world. Yet Republicans are nice to him and do nothing to hold him accountable for his miserable failure as Hollywood's key congressional representative in Washington. [I.e., testiclevoiditus - snip]

During Mr. Waxman's 35-year tenure, Hollywood has not just shipped countless jobs overseas, it has become the ultimate outsourced industry. Films are invariably financed by foreign countries: Russians, Saudis, French and Germans, to name but a few guilty parties, now dictate the content of what many consider the DNA of American culture.

Where was Henry?

Ever wonder why the white American businessmen are always the bad guys and radical Islamists almost never are? More money is now made from foreign than domestic box office.

As a result, Hollywood now crafts its moral, ethical and political messages to assuage external sensibilities... [snip]

Hopefully, new Republican Party chairman Michael S. Steele, who promised in his acceptance speech last week to take the Republican message places it hasn't been taken previously, will see that in Mr. Waxman - a liberal Democrat who has done nothing to save jobs in his district - the Republicans have a fantastic poster child for the empty rhetoric of the modern Left.


[but before you can win an argument you must engage in it]

READ MORE


Thursday, February 5, 2009


Support for Stimulus Package Falls to 37%

Support for the economic recovery plan working its way through Congress has fallen again this week. For the first time, a plurality of voters nationwide oppose the $800-billion-plus plan.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 37% favor the legislation, 43% are opposed, and 20% are not sure. Two weeks ago, 45% supported the plan. Last week, 42% supported it.

Opposition has grown from 34% two weeks ago to 39% last week and 43% today.

READ MORE


.

"We don't have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven't taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much."
-- Ronald Reagan
.

Ronald Reagan isn’t just a Republican thing anymore.

Fifty-six percent (56%) of U.S. voters say the Republican Party should return to the views and values of the iconic 40th president of the United States to be successful, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the GOP should move away from the Reagan legacy, and 15% aren’t sure which is the best course to follow.

Eighty-five percent (85%) of Republican voters believe a return to the two-term president’s views and values are the road to success. Just eight percent (8%) disagree.

Among unaffiliated voters, 61% say the Republican Party should return to Reagan, while 23% think the party should move away from those values.

Even 29% of Democrats think Reagan is a good role model for the modern Republican Party, although 50% disagree and 21% are undecided.

In his first inaugural address, Reagan declared that “Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” Fifty-nine percent (59%) 59% of voters still agree with him. Reagan also strongly believed that tax cuts are good for the economy, and 57% of voters continue to share that view.

Only 17% disagree.

[yet here we are, because we wanted a 'cool' president - and we've paired him with a majority in congress]

READ MORE

The Senate is expected to vote on S.1, its
version of the bill, the first week of February...

If the Senate follows the House’s lead and passes this borrow-and-spend "stimulus" bill, it will waste record amounts of tax dollars, provide virtually no benefit to the economy, and only add to our nation's soaring liabilities.




Please tell your Senators today to vote
NO on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act!
[mere seconds to complete -
click link and please, pass it on]
.

UN backtracks on claim that deadly IDF strike hit Gaza school

[HT:Ldot: "Something to keep in mind when reading dispatches from that part of the world "]

The United Nations has reversed its stance on one of the most contentious and bloody incidents of the recent Israel Defense Forces operation in Gaza, saying that an IDF mortar strike that killed 43 people on January 6 did not hit one of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency schools after all.

It seems that the UN has been under pressure to put the record straight after doubts arose that the school had actually been targeted. Maxwell Gaylord, the UN humanitarian coordinator in Jerusalem, said Monday that the IDF mortar shells fell in the street near the compound, and not on the compound itself.

Gaylord said that the UN "would like to clarify that the shelling and all of the fatalities took place outside and not inside the school"

READ MORE

Iraq Is Obama's Mideast Pillar

As an Arab democracy, it's a model for what we would like the rest of the Arab world to become.

Imagine yourself as Barack Obama, gazing at a map of the greater Middle East and wondering how, and where, the United States can best make a fresh start in the region.

Your gaze wanders rightward to Pakistan, threatening war with India ... Iran, drawing ever closer to its bomb ... Israel is talking pre-emption ... Palestine is riven between feckless moderates and pitiless fanatics ... Lebanon and Hezbollah are nearly synonyms ... [snip]

And then there is Iraq, the country in the middle that you would have just as soon banished from sight. How's it doing? Perplexingly well.

In 2005, Iraqis voted their sectarian preferences. Now sectarian parties are out of fashion. "Those candidates who campaigned under the banner of religion should be rejected," Abdul Kareem told Al Jazeera. "They corrupted the name of religion because they are notorious for being thieves. Religion is not politics." Mr. Kareem is a Shiite cleric.

Also out of fashion: Iran, previously thought to be the jolly inheritor of our Iraq misadventure ... This time, Sadr didn't even dare to field his own slate, and early reports are that the Supreme Council was trounced.

What's in fashion, electorally speaking, are secular parties, as well as the moderately religious Dawa Party of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. This wasn't supposed to happen. The Palestinian parliamentary election of 2006 that put Hamas in power was taken in the West as proof that Arab democracy was destined to yield illiberal results. Saturday's election suggests otherwise... [snip]

So what are you going to do about the one bright spot on your map -- an Arab country that is genuinely democratic, increasingly secular and secure, anti-Iranian and, all-in-all, on your side? So far, your only idea seems to bid to it good luck and bring most of the troops home in time for Super Bowl Sunday, 2010. [snip]

There was a time when American strategists understood the role countries could play as "pillars" of a regional strategy. Within the Arab world, Iraq is the only country that can now fulfill that role. For that it will need military and economic aid, and lots of it. Better it than futile causes like Palestine, or missions impossible like winning over the mullahs.

With Saturday's poll, Iraq has earned a powerful claim to our friendship. Yes, you'd rather look elsewhere on the map for a Mideast legacy. But Iraq is where you'll find it. Don't miss your chance.

[Recommended > ]

READ MORE

N Korea missile can hit US zones


NORTH Korea's belligerent posturing of recent weeks appears to have escalated into preparations to test-fire a long-range missile capable of hitting US territories, according to Japanese and South Korean officials. Reports in Tokyo and Seoul yesterday, quoting unnamed government officials, indicated US satellite surveillance had detected preparations for a Taepodong-2 missile launch at a recently identified west coast missile base.

READ MORE

Our German Problem, and Theirs

It’s 10 p.m. Do you know where the German Army is?

If it’s the few thousand social worker-servicemen in Afghanistan, they’re probably tucked securely into bed. That’s because German soldiers serving with the U.S. and other allies have a curfew, among other “national caveats” that prevent them from making a serious military contribution to the fight against the Taliban.

On crucial issues ... Germany still lags, especially by continuing to trade with the Iranians and especially in Afghanistan, where their obduracy is helping to jeopardize the fight against the Taliban and thereby bringing into question the very future of NATO.

For over three years, 100 members of the German KSF Special Forces were stationed in Afghanistan but apparently did not participate in a single mission, and now their inactivity is being cynically exploited by German politicians as a questionable excuse to bring them home.

The fate of Afghanistan and NATO may hang in the balance, but by 10:00 p.m. German soldiers are no doubt safely abed. Four time zones to the West, amidst lush countryside and bright and shiny cities Germany’s 82 million citizens go about their business enjoying peace and plenty that is still all-too-often ensured by her allies.

READ MORE

NEW DEAL OR RAW DEAL?

Some seem to believe Barack Obama is the second coming of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Yet, before we embrace a "new" New Deal, its worth revisiting the alleged success of the old one, says economic historian Burton Folsom Jr., in his new book, "New Deal or Raw Deal?"

According to Folsom, FDR is remembered for his economic populism and campaigns against business leaders and "economic royalists." Less known is how heavily his policies weighed on the poor and the working class:

  • Despite his best efforts to soak the rich and impose near-confiscatory tax rates on high earners, the early New Deal relied upon heavily regressive excise taxes.
  • From 1933-1936, federal revenues from excise taxes were greater than those from personal and corporate income taxes combined.
  • Despite the enactment of many new federal programs, there was little positive result; by 1939 Roosevelt's treasury secretary, Henry Morgenthau, was forced to admit that "we are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work."
  • While unemployment dropped during Roosevelt's first term, it crept back up between 1936 and 1939, and stock values plummet from 1937-1939, causing some to call the late 1930s a depression within the Depression.
  • Moreover, the U.S. underperformed other industrialized nations during the 1930s.
Even accounting for differences in how economic indicators were calculated in various nations, Folsom notes, "the U.S. economy under Roosevelt did poorly not only in an absolute sense, but in a relative sense as well." More recent economic research, confirms Folsom's claim that the New Deal did more to extend the Depression than to end it.

READ MORE







[that's right, a 2nd {different} petition.
Go ahead, it's free...]

WHERE HAVE YOU GONE, GRAY DAVIS?

In 2006, California passed the most sweeping greenhouse gas limits for any state in the union. Under the plan, CO2 output would be slashed by 25 percent by the year 2020; that is equivalent to removing 6.5 million vehicles from the road.

Sounds great, except that greenhouse gas output has yet to budge, and the promised boom from "green jobs" is nowhere in sight. California's jobless rate is now officially over 7 percent, nearly a point above the national average.

Instead, the greenhouse gas limits approved by Gov. Schwarzenegger will cost California billions of dollars in lost output as businesses locate elsewhere and take jobs with them:

  • California's nonpartisan budget analyst predicted the state will have a $27.8 billion deficit over the next 20 months.
  • This gap is equal to roughly 26 percent of the state's $103.3 billion in annual general-fund spending; if nothing's done, the deficit will average $22 billion a year for the next five years.
Gov. Schwarzenegger's response has been to cut spending and raise taxes, says IBD. The time to cut spending, however, was 4 years ago, not when disaster struck. A narrow slice of rich Californians now pay virtually all the state's taxes, so when a downturn occurs, the budget collapses:

  • Since then, overall spending under Schwarzenegger has soared $41 billion, or more than 40 percent.
  • General-fund spending has jumped by $27 billion to $103.3 billion, a 35 percent increase.
Moreover, California's economy is struggling in large part because Schwarzenegger hasn't lived up to his promise to tackle the out-of-control budget. Instead, he's riding his global warming hobbyhorse...

READ MORE


Obama's conflicting goals

President-elect Barack Obama is taking office embracing two almost mutually exclusive economic goals. On the one hand, he wants to gain control over the spiraling federal budget deficit - the excess of spending over revenues - and on the other he is seeking massive federal spending in an attempt to kick-start the flagging economy.

READ MORE

[3rd: any-and-all economic progress will be overshadowed by the massive economic hit of obligating us to any manner of Kyoto-like AGW swindle...]


Obama vows to engage world on climate change

LOS ANGELES — US president-elect Barack Obama on Tuesday vowed he would "engage vigorously" in global climate change talks and that denial was no longer an acceptable response to global warming.

READ MORE

MANDATORY HEALTH INSURANCE FAILS IN MASSACHUSETTS

America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), a trade group representing more than 1,000 insurance providers, has come out in favor of a law requiring everyone to buy what they sell. This may be the wave of the future: if people don't want to buy what you sell, get a law passed making them do it anyway, says health economist Greg Scandlen.

But this mandate approach isn't going so well in Massachusetts, which remains the highest profile state to implement an individual insurance mandate:

  • State costs have gone up so much that Massachusetts has decided to cut payments to physicians and hospitals, reducing access to medical services.
  • The state is also planning to mandate an increase of 10-12 percent in insurance premiums while cutting payments to physicians and hospitals by 3-5 percent; this will reduce access to care even more.
  • Even the poor are being hurt; the Cambridge Health Alliance, which has long provided care to the indigent, is cutting staff, reducing services and limiting referrals to specialists in an effort to stay solvent in the face of rising costs and reduced payments.
In addition to all these problems, the program is now costing taxpayers $400 million more than originally advertised, 85 percent more than the promised cost. [since Jul. 3 2007: one and a half years, 85%]

Mandatory insurance violates insurers' and consumers' right to act in their own best interests by forcing insurers to sell and customers to purchase insurance on terms and prices dictated by government decree. This destroys the very conditions that give insurance any value at all, concludes Scandlen.

[how many of these abysmal failure stories must we endure before the message sinks in: they're doomed to failure - so by all means let's now try it at the national level...]

READ MORE

Congress: The New Power Class

.
There is no native criminal class except Congress.
- Mark Twain

Traditionally Americans have loved to hate their Congress. But in the last several years our country has changed. Most clear thinking Americans no longer hate our Congress -- we now fear it.

The reason for this fear is, and should be, deeply disturbing. Those who have carefully followed the bailout bills that Congress has recently passed know just how pervasive the corruption has become. But the whole story goes much deeper than mere trillions of dollars. America is losing (or has already lost) its constitutional republic.

Americans also traditionally love to hate the rich and powerful. Tales of the 19th century "robber barons" have the cultural status of epic myths in American history. Even if they were greedy and unscrupulous, the Rockefellers, Mellons, and Carnagies helped create wealth in this country. The acquisitions of their personal fortunes may have been ruthlessly pursued; but their fortunes were not solely obtained by stealing money from their fellow citizens using the power of the central government.

The robber barons became powerful because they created wealth. In that sense, these men earned their power and influence. Congress has turned this principle on its head. Our elected representatives become wealthy because they wield their political power in an unconstitutional, and often illegal, manner. The new power class in America is not productive ... it is Machiavellian. [snip]

There was a brief window of opportunity for our elected officials to stop the graft. The Republicans took the majority from the Democrats in Congress in 1994 on the heels of multiple revelations of massive fraud by the Democrats.

The Republicans had a plan and a playbook. It was called "Republican Contract with America." Here are the actual promises that were made:

FIRST, require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress;

SECOND, select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse;

THIRD, cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third;

FOURTH, limit the terms of all committee chairs; [recently repealed by Pelosi]

FIFTH, ban the casting of proxy votes in committee;

SIXTH, require committee meetings to be open to the public;

SEVENTH, require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase;

EIGHTH, guarantee an honest accounting of our Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting.

The plan lasted about two years. The Republicans discovered that it was much easier to raise a million dollars by having lunch on K Street, than it was getting 10,000 of their constituents to pop for a hundred bucks each. Republicans reneged on their contract and set about strong arming K Street lobbyists. In short, the Republicans became a more traditional power class, following the historical example set by the Democrats.

Now the Democrats are back in power. Our Congress is the new power class of America -- a robber baron pretending to be a Robin Hood.

READ MORE


It's hard to believe I'm no longer American

In the last several weeks I've learned that I am no longer an American. Given the taxes that I have paid, who would have known?

On the front of USA Today was the screaming headline, "Americans go gaga over first lady's inaugural gown." I didn't even know she had an inaugural gown. Then, and this is the tricky part, it turns out, according to rumor, that she hadn't actually picked out the gown she would wear; it was still before noon on the day of the inaugural.

I could not connect with the inauguration of our new president. Evidently, I would be gaga later, but the USA Today was so sure that I, as an American, would be gaga that the headline could be written in advance.

The day after the inauguration, the USA Today headline read, "Emotions reach heightened pitch across USA." I must be living in Canada; at least it is cold enough to be Canada. I worked all that day, leaving my office well after 10 p.m. My emotions were pretty stable, they weren't even "heightened," let alone pitched.

[The point: He's a government employee that is answerable to us - not the other way around. It's prudent to remember that.]

READ MORE

Time Mag: Obama a 'Prince' Like Jesus Born of 'Imagination, History and Hope'


This week's Weekly Standard magazine recited “some of the worst over-the-top reactions to The One's ascendance,” starting with Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story by comparing Obama with Jesus:

“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...”

In the issue, she heralded (citing his full name) the 'greater meaning' of Obama's victory and gushed over how

“an election in one of the world's oldest democracies looked like the kind they hold in brand-new ones, when citizens finally come out and dance, a purple-thumb day, a velvet revolution.”


[I would love to adopt the purple [index finger] thing - but it would put ACORN out of business so the Dems will never allow it]

READ MORE

[opinions vary]

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Link


What Michael Phelps Should Have Said
Dear America, I take it back. I don’t apologize. Because you know what? It’s none of your goddamned business.(Snip)If during my brief window of down time I want to relax, enjoy myself, and partake of a substance that’s a hell of a lot less bad for me than alcohol, tobacco, or, frankly, most of the prescription drugs most of you are taking, well, you can spare me the lecture.
READ MORE

Time for Tim Geithner to Step Down, Too

Now that Tom Daschle has withdrawn his nomination for health secretary because of his failure to pay taxes, and Nancy Killefer, who was appointed chief performance officer and deputy OMB director, has also withdrawn because of non-payment of taxes, it is time for Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner to do exactly the same.
READ MORE

The Case for No Stimulus

For the last three months, Americans have been treated to a debate over what the government can do to ease the effects of the current recession and bring about a speedy recovery. Lawmakers of both parties are now considering a very large stimulus package.

But there is a catch. Every penny of such a package must be borrowed, because the government is already running a $1.2 trillion deficit this year and faces a $703 billion deficit for next year, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. The question, then, is whether the government can help the economy by spending money if it can only do so by first sucking that money out of the economy. It is a question that surprisingly few public voices are expressing.

I spoke Monday with the Heritage Foundation’s leading budget analyst, Brian Riedl, about deficit spending as a silver bullet for ending recessions, and about whether the stimulus package now proposed is necessary or even helpful. [snip]

"That is a great question. The grand Keynesian myth is that you can spend money and thereby increase demand. And it’s a myth because Congress does not have a vault of money to distribute in the economy. Every dollar Congress injects into the economy must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy. You’re not creating new demand, you’re just transferring it from one group of people to another.

If Washington borrows the money from domestic lenders, then investment spending falls, dollar for dollar. If they borrow the money from foreigners, say from China, then net exports drop dollar for dollar, because the balance of payments must adjust. Therefore, again, there is no net increase in aggregate demand. It just means that one group of people has $800 billion less to spend, and the government has $800 billion more to spend."

The simple fact is that the only way to create economic growth is to increase productivity. Redistributing money from one group of people to another doesn’t create productivity or economic growth.

" I’m not sure why economists haven’t been pointing this out *. . . For politicians, though, it’s much more understandable. Keynesian economics offers the promise of a free lunch. It offers the idea that government can wave a magic wand, spend money, and make the recession end in a pain-free way.

It’s just not that easy."

[* Because if you point out that the emperor has no clothes, you're labeled as obstructionist and the problem. Highly Recommended > ]

READ MORE

Democrats Target 28 GOP Lawmakers on Stimulus Bill

The House Democrats’ political arm is launching a radio, email, and telephone campaign against 28 House Republicans in 20 states who voted against the $819 billion economic-stimulus package last week. Targeted members in leadership include Minority Whip Eric Cantor [VA], Republican Policy Committee Chairman Thaddeus McCotter [MI], and National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Pete Sessions [TX].

[Is this our new definition of 'honest debate' - targeting dissenters?]

READ MORE

US confirms Iran launch of first home-built satellite

The US confirmed Tuesday that Iran has launched its first home-built satellite into orbit, raising fresh concerns in an international community already at odds with Tehran over its nuclear drive.

"It appears that the Iranians conducted a launch of a low orbit satellite," said a US official, who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity.

A jubilant Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad earlier announced the lift-off, which coincided with the 30th anniversary of the Islamic revolution, on state television

"Dear Iranians, your children have put the first indigenous satellite into orbit," said Ahmadinejad.

"With this launch the Islamic Republic of Iran has officially achieved a presence in space." [snip]

Iran has pursued a space program for several years, and in October 2005 a Russian-made Iranian satellite named Sina-1 was put into orbit by a Russian rocket.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gofNdXgzp5YhXPSB1xIII1DRSqXQ

White House: Iran not acting responsibly

WASHINGTON -- The White House says Iran is not acting responsibly with its satellite launch.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that Iran's launch of its first domestically made satellite

"does not convince us that Iran is acting responsibly to advance stability or security in the region."

[And what more, exactly, will it take to 'convince' them that Iran is intentionally destabilizing the region? {or does everything they say and do somehow not count?}]

READ MORE

Europe could be within Iranian missile range

BRUSSELS - Iran's announcement that it has launched its first satellite would, if true, confirm that the Islamic republic has missiles capable of striking Israel and southeast Europe, a NATO officer said Tuesday. However the officer said, on condition of anonymity, that it could take up to a week to verify whether Tehran's claim that it had sent an Omid (Hope) satellite into space on a home-built Safir-2 space rocket was true.
READ MORE

Iran's slow but sure missile advance

Iran's apparently successful launch of its own satellite by its own rocket shows how it is slowly but surely mastering the missile technology that the West and Israel fear one day might be available as a delivery system for a nuclear weapon. It also shows, as Iran itself has triumphantly proclaimed, that the UN sanctions against Iran, which include sanctions against its missile programme as well as its nuclear activities, have not stopped this event.

[because the UN has evolved into an organization that seats countries like China and Russia on the security council with veto authority]

READ MORE

Kyrgyzstan to close U.S. base used to supply Afghanistan


MOSCOW — In a setback to the escalating U.S. military efforts in Afghanistan , the president of Kyrgyzstan said Tuesday that his government will shut down the American air base in his country.

U.S. officials say that the Manas Air Base is vital to plans to send an additional 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan , a linchpin of President Barack Obama's efforts to pacify the country.

The announcement by President Kurmanbek Bakiyev came in Moscow , not in his own capital, and shortly after the Russian government reportedly agreed to lend Kyrgyzstan $2 billion , write off $180 million in debt and add another $150 million in aid.

Although the Russian government didn't release a statement about the decision, the timing and place of the announcement indicated that the Kremlin had been involved...

READ MORE

Rift with EU as US sticks to Bush line on 'war on drugs'

A rift between the EU and US over how to deal with global trafficking in illicit drugs is undermining international efforts to agree a new UN strategy. The confrontation has been heightened because of suggestions that the US negotiating team is pushing a hardline, Bush administration "war on drugs", in contrast to the EU position which supports "harm reduction" measures such as needle exchanges.

Talks are said to be at breaking point in Vienna where representatives have gathered to hammer out a new UN declaration in time for a signing ceremony at a drugs summit in mid-March. Negotiations, which have been going on for three months, are due to resume tomorrow with no indication of a breakthrough. At the heart of the dispute is whether a commitment to "harm reduction" should be included in the UN declaration of intent.

The US position, as maintained throughout the Bush years, is that such inclusion sends the wrong message and must be resisted. President Obama has already lifted the ban on federal funding for needle exchanges and is known to have a more liberal approach to the issue, but the US negotiating team is opposed to varying the "drug-free" strategies of the past.

READ MORE

Quin-essential Cases: Unleaded economy could fuel huge job losses

Folks often hear the exhortation to “get the lead out” when moving too slowly. But Congress’s over-hasty insistence on getting the lead out is about to cause massive economic problems in an already weak economy.

The Manhattan Institute’s Walter Olson wrote Jan. 16 in Forbes that a new law, limiting lead content in consumer products, probably will be

“a calamity for businesses and an epic failure of regulation, threatening to wipe out tens of thousands of small makers of children's items from coast to coast, and taking a particular toll on the handcrafted and creative, the small-production-run and sideline at-home business, not to mention struggling retailers.”

As usual, only the plaintiffs’ attorneys are rubbing their hands in glee.

Last August, Congress passed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, which mandates that all products for children ages 12 and under be tested for lead and phthalates (a chemical in many plastics), and that no such products be sold with lead contents higher than 600 parts per million.

The sales ban applies retroactively, too: Even if the items in question were made 100 years ago, The Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) has advised that a second-hand store could be subject to lawsuits or even “criminal penalties” for selling them... [snip]

If Congress and President Obama have any decency, they will pass an emergency bill this very week to delay all implementation of the act for a full year, until they themselves can re-do the original legislation to make it more clear, and more sensible.

READ MORE


Workers face smoking ban while in NHS uniform … even at home

HOSPITAL staff are facing a blanket ban on smoking at any time while they are in uniform – or even wearing an NHS badge – under a crackdown proposed by officials at one of Scotland's largest health boards

Patients and hospital visitors could also be prevented from taking packets of cigarettes on to hospital grounds under the move, which aims to completely outlaw smoking on every site operated by the North-east health authority. [snip]

Neil Rafferty, a spokesman for the pro-smoking organization [?] Forest, said:

"To suggest that a member of staff cannot smoke during what is effectively their own time, during breaks, is tantamount to health fascism. They shouldn't be bullying workers into trying to change their lifestyle."

[the inevitable evolution of government social engineering: fascism]

READ MORE

Keynesian fallacy

There are very few economists who really buy into Keynesian theory anymore. Instead, the idea of “rational expectations” has taken its place. The difference between the two approaches is essential to understanding why Obama’s stimulus package won’t work. Keynes felt that people would react automatically to a few dollars in their hands. Consumers would run out and buy new products, and businessmen, seeing the uptick in sales, would rush to open new plants and hire new workers who would, in turn, generate more demand.

But that’s not the real world. In reality, consumers, knowing there are hard times ahead, save any money they get either by salting it away or by paying down their debts and bills. That’s why the personal saving rate in the last quarter of 2008 was the highest in six years and spending on residential construction was down 22 percent over the past year. And the savings rate rose from 2.8 percent in November 2008 to 3.6 percent in December as the storm clouds grew grayer. And, in the real world, banks hang onto their money for fear of making bad loans, no matter how many bailouts or stimulus packages Washington passes.

According to the Federal Reserve Board of St. Louis, the Fed is now holding upwards of $1.7 trillion for American banks, more than twice what it had in its vaults at the start of 2008. How did the Fed get the money? Congress voted the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) package of bailout funds. The Fed purchased bank assets to get liquidity onto their balance sheets. What did the banks do with the money? They gave it right back to the Fed to hold in its vaults. They didn’t lend it out. They didn’t use it to stimulate the economy. They are using it for a nest egg to tap when times improve.

Just like the theory of rational expectations says they would.

[Recommended > ]

READ MORE



[that's right, a 2nd {different} petition.
Go ahead, it's free...]


Snow and freezing weather threaten to shut down Britain

Arctic blizzards are set to cause a national shutdown tomorrow as forecasters warn of the most widespread snowfall for almost 20 years. The Met Office is warning of an "extreme weather event" across large swathes of England, Scotland and Wales with up to 10in of snow expected even in the usually warmer south and as much as 1ft on higher ground.
READ MORE

Why do Green zealots think they can dictate how many children we are allowed to have?

So the deepest green of them all turns out to be not so much a friend of the earth as an enemy of the human race. Jonathon Porritt, the [UK's] Government's 'green' adviser, has said that couples who have more than two children are being 'irresponsible' by creating an unbearable burden on the environment.

'Curbing' population growth through contraception and abortion must therefore be at the heart of policies to fight man-made global warming...

[when I say a mechanism for governments to control everything, I mean everything.]

READ MORE

Marketing Solar Panels to Fifth-Graders


Employees of the Sharp Electronics Corporation were at Joyce Kilmer Elementary School in Mahwah, N.J., recently to teach a lesson on climate change and renewable energy. The cartoon image of an ailing Earth — a thermometer sticking out of its mouth — was the opening slide in their presentation.

Climate change and energy are complex issues, so I was interested to observe how they would be distilled by the Japanese electronics giant — and one of the world’s largest makers of solar panels — to an audience of 10- and 11-year-olds. I recently sat in the back of a fifth-grade class and listened in.

“It turns out that the temperature of the Earth is actually rising,” she said. Ms. Harvey then asked if anyone knew what C02 is. “Carbon dioxide,” a student answered. Ms. Harvey explained that carbon dioxide is actually a good thing, because it helps keep the Earth’s atmosphere warm, but the problem is that there’s now too much of it... [snip]

Bill Howe, a fifth-grade science teacher, told the Sharp instructors afterward that they should make the curriculum available to teachers everywhere and that he would be happy to help in any way possible. “I think my students are excited by the idea that there’s a huge change going on,” Mr. Howe said.

[Do you know what your kids are being taught?]

READ MORE

Cuba Plans New Offshore Drilling in Search for Big Oil Finds in the Gulf of Mexico

Cuban officials say that exploratory drilling to assess the potential for oil reserves in the Gulf of Mexico is likely to resume in the second quarter of this year, a sign that lower world oil prices have not derailed efforts by the Cuban government and its foreign corporate partners to keep moving toward offshore oil production.

[Marvelous; I need look to Cuba for an example of intelligent foresight.]

READ MORE

Will Democrats Reinstate Offshore Drilling Ban?

On Jan. 6, according to a report in the Santa Rosa (Calif.) Press-Democrat, two Congressional Democrats from Northern California — Reps. Lynn Woolsey of Petaluma and Mike Thompson of St. Helena — introduced legislation to permanently ban oil drilling off the coast.

Had either of these environmental pinheads read my Sept. 30 post, Reasons to Oppose Offshore Drilling Obsolete, they would have learned that their arguments are based on out-of-date thinking: [snip]

If you’re as disgusted as I am with Democrats in Congress doing everything they can to prevent this country from realizing energy independence, CONTACT YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS in Washington, D.C., and demand they do the right thing. Threaten them with your vote. Say whatever it takes to convince them that reinstating the ban on offshore drilling is the wrong thing to do.

READ MORE




"OPPOSE ALL DRILLING BANS"


Whitehouse: mailto:president@whitehouse.gov
House-Pelosi: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
YOUR Congressman: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

or: Speed Message them with your personal distribution list...
and as always, pass it on...
.